Laserfiche WebLink
ri1 <br /> . GROUND ZERO ANALYSIS, INC. <br /> 1714 Main Street <br /> Escalon,California 95320-1927 <br /> Telephone (209)838-9888 <br /> Facsimile (209)838-9883 <br /> April 27, 2004 <br /> Mr Harlin Knoll <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> Subject First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Knowles Property, 1140 W Hammer Lane, Stockton, CA <br /> Dear Mr Knoll <br /> This report summarizes activities at the subject site during the first quarter 2004 The site location is <br /> presented on Figure 1 Activities conducted during the reporting period included monitoring depth to <br /> • water in site wells, purging and sampling wells MW1, MW3, MW4, MW5, and MW9, and analyzing <br /> groundwater samples for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes (BTEX), and total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline(TPHg) <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> An experienced Ground Zero technician measured the depth to groundwater in wells MW 1, MW2, <br /> MW3, MW4, MW5, and MW9 on February 19, 2004 The depth to groundwater beneath the site ranged <br /> from 35 55 feet below the top of the well casing (btoc) in well MW3 to 37 20 feet btoc in well MW2 <br /> Groundwater elevations in site wells rose an average of 3 22 feet between November 12, 2003 and <br /> February 19, 2004 The water table beneath the site lies above the screened intervals in wells MW4 and <br /> MW5 Groundwater flow was generally toward the east-northeast with an average gradient of 0 0017 <br /> (approximately 9 feet per mile) A potentiometric surface map for February 19, 2004 is presented on <br /> Figure 2 Monitoring well construction details are summarized in Table 1 Groundwater monitoring data <br /> are summarized in Table 2 <br /> A Ground Zero technician purged at least three well casing volumes of groundwater from monitoring <br /> wells MWI, MW3, MW4, MW5, and MW9 on February 19, 2004 Physical parameters (temperature, <br /> specific conductance, pH and turbidity) were measured and recorded during the purging process All <br /> downhole equipment was decontaminated prior to and between each use by washing with a solution of <br /> laboratory-grade detergent and then double-rinsing with water Groundwater samples were collected <br /> using dedicated disposable bailers after physical parameters stabilized, and water levels recovered to at <br /> least 80% of pre-purged levels The samples were decanted into 40-m1 glass vials preserved with 1 1 <br /> • hydrochloric acid solution The samples were subsequently placed in an ice chest refrigerated to a <br /> temperature of approximately 4°C <br /> G IGROUNDZHIKN0WLES HAMIREP0RTSIQMR1200411 QM2004 doc <br />