Laserfiche WebLink
\ ri <br /> Mr Harlin Knoll <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> dedicated disposable bailers after physical parameters stabilized, and water levels recovered to at least <br /> 80% of pre-purged levels The samples were decanted into 40-m1 glass vials preserved with 1 1 <br /> hydrochloric acid solution The samples were subsequently placed in an ice chest refrigerated to a <br /> temperature of approximately 4°C <br /> The samples were transported to Argon Laboratories (ELAP 42359) under chain of custody protocol and <br /> analyzed for TPI-Ig and BTEX utilizing EPA methods 8015B and 8021B, respectively Purged <br /> groundwater was contained in labeled 55-gallon drums pending disposal Copies of field purge logs and <br /> water level measurements are included in Attachment A <br /> Drilling, Soil Sampling,and Well Installation <br /> On November 21, 2003, Spectrum Exploration (Spectrum, C57-512268) installed groundwater <br /> monitoring well MW9 under the supervision of Ground Zero geologist Sean Garvey and project manager <br /> John Lane (RG-6795) The well was installed approximately 220 feet northeast (downgradient) of the <br /> former underground storage tanks Figure 2 shows the location of well MW9 relative to the other site wells <br /> Spectrum utilized a drilling rig equipped with hollow stem augers to advance the boring and install the <br /> well A five-foot long core sampler was used to continuously collect soil samples for subjective <br /> evaluation of contamination and lithologic classification Soil encountered during drilling consisted of <br /> interbedded sand, silt, and clay Sandy soil was encountered between the depths of 6 and 10 feet bgs and 22 <br /> and 32 feet bgs No soil was retained in the sampler retrieved from the depth interval of 45 to 50 feet bgs, <br /> implying that soil in that interval is also likely sand Groundwater was initially encountered at a depth of <br /> approximately 39 feet bgs during drilling <br /> Based on the lithology and the initial depth to groundwater observed during drilling, well MW9 was <br /> screened from approximately 34 feet bgs to 54 feet bgs The well was constructed of 2-inch diameter, <br /> Schedule 40 PVC casing and 0 010 slot screen 42/12 sand filter pack was placed from the bottom of the <br /> well to approximately 2 feet above the screened interval The annular seal consisted of 2 feet of hydrated <br /> bentonite pellets overlain by neat cement grout The well was completed with a traffic-rated, grade-level <br /> well box, and a locking well cap Mr Harlan Knoll of San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department(EHD) observed field activities and inspected the grout seal A boring/well construction log <br /> is included in Attachment B <br /> All drilling and sampling equipment was decontaminated prior to use and between sample collection to <br /> minimize cross contamination Waste soil and water generated during drilling activities was placed DOT <br /> certified 55-gallon drums Both waste streams are currently stored on site pending disposal <br /> Soil samples collected at depths of approximately 35 feet and 54 feet below ground surface (bgs) were <br /> sealed, labeled and immediately placed in an ice chest cooled to a temperature of approximately 4° C <br /> The samples were subsequently transported to Argon Laboratories under chain of custody protocol and <br /> analyzed TPHg using EPA Method 8015B, BTEX and methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) using EPA <br /> 8021B, and total lead using EPA 7420 <br /> Well Development and Sampling <br /> An experienced Ground Zero technician monitored the depth to groundwater and developed and sampled <br /> well MW9 on November 26, 2003 The depth to groundwater in well MW9 was 38 91 feet btoc The <br /> G 1GROUNDZEIKNOWLES HAMIREF0RTSIQMRU00314QM2003 doc <br />