My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002102
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
1120
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545244
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2020 10:24:45 AM
Creation date
1/30/2020 9:11:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002102
RECORD_ID
PR0545244
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0024606
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER KNOWLES STATION
STREET_NUMBER
1120
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
07749027
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1120 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
���� <br /> Working To Restore Nature <br /> 7.0 REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES <br /> In accordance with PHS/EHD's guidelines, RESNA has considered at least two remediation <br /> ' alternatives, which are discussed below. The following general response alternatives for the site <br /> have been considered: <br /> ' O Alternative 1 - Passive Remediation <br /> O Alternative 2 - Soil Vapor Extraction with Groundwater Extraction <br /> ' O Alternative 3 - Groundwater Extraction and Passive Soil Remediation <br /> ' 7.1 Alternative 1 - Passive Remediation <br /> This alternative would involve no active remediation Naturally occurring microbes which <br /> ' degrade petroleum hydrocarbon constituents over time would be utilized to gradually reduce <br /> residual hydrocarbons in the soil and groundwater. Groundwater contaminants would be <br /> ' monitored on a regular basis via the existing site wells to monitor the migration of contaminants <br /> Nfmimal capital outlay would be required for this option to be put into action. <br /> ' 7.2 Alternative 2 - Soil Vapor Extraction with Groundwater Extraction <br /> This alternative involves remediation of impacted soils by vapor extraction with remediation of <br /> ' groundwater by extraction and subsequent treatment Initiation of these systems would include <br /> the following activities: preparing plans and specifications, obtaining necessary permits; and <br /> ' installing the vapor and groundwater extraction piping, treatment compound(s), and treatment <br /> device(s) (catalytic oxidizer and/or granular activated carbon). The extraction system(s) would <br /> be monitored at least monthly or at the frequency specified by the appropriate permits. <br /> Groundwater monitoring would continue on a regular basis until project completion. <br /> 1 <br /> Vapor extraction with air sparging was dismissed as a potential remedial alternative because of <br /> site soil characteristics. Air sparging injects pressurized air into the groundwater via a well or <br /> wells that are screened below the water table As the air nses through the aquifer it volatilizes <br /> ' dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons and residual phase hydrocarbons adsorbed in the soil below <br /> the water table and transfers them to the gaseous phase The process gas nses to the unsaturated <br /> 1500 8MTOMXC"-07%DRF 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.