My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002102
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
1120
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545244
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2020 10:24:45 AM
Creation date
1/30/2020 9:11:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002102
RECORD_ID
PR0545244
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0024606
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER KNOWLES STATION
STREET_NUMBER
1120
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
07749027
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1120 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Working To Restore Nature <br /> O Criterion 7. <br /> This alternative would have nmplementabilnty problems due to the time involved in <br /> ' obtaining permits for the groundwater extraction system, system design and <br /> installation. <br /> o Criterion 8: <br /> ' Impact to businesses during installation and other site activities would be minimal <br /> and should meet with public and regulatory acceptance. <br /> Alternate,ve 3, Groundwater Extraction and Passive Soil_Remediation <br /> ' o Criterion 1. <br /> This alternative has limited health-based risks. Petroleum hydrocarbons are removed <br /> ' from extracted groundwater prior to discharge minimizing the risk of human <br /> exposure. The potential fire or explosion hazard should be minimized with a <br /> properly designed system. <br /> i <br /> 1 o Cntenon 2: <br /> ' Tlus alternative would reduce the toxicity, mobility and volume of contaminants in <br /> groundwater. Reduction in soils would be accomplished over time through natural <br /> biodegradation processes, but the timeframe is unknown. <br /> ' o Criterion 3: <br /> This alternative can be implemented within regulatory guidelines <br /> o <br /> Criterion 4: <br /> ' This alternative would require some capital outlay to implement. Capital costs are <br /> associated with installation of groundwater extraction well(s) and associated piping, <br /> ' installation of the treatment system and compound, and permitting, and could <br /> 15MMEMRMCAP-0794 DRF 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.