My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARLAN
>
9504
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508462
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2020 3:05:48 PM
Creation date
1/30/2020 11:03:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0508462
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008093
FACILITY_NAME
CONTINENTAL GRAIN CO
STREET_NUMBER
9504
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
HARLAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
FRENCH CAMP
Zip
95231
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9504 S HARLAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR <br /> APPLICATION OF WASTE DISCHARGE <br /> FRENCH CAMP GRAIN ELEVATOR <br /> ' PILOT SCALE REMEDIATION PROJECT <br /> ' 1. Introduction <br /> This application seeks authorization to conduct a pilot study in an impacted aquifer at the French <br /> ' Camp Elevator in French Camp, California. The pilot study will evaluate the effectiveness of <br /> injecting zero-valent iron (ZVI) into the affected groundwater system to reduce carbon <br /> tetrachloride concentrations in the aquifer. The method of ZVI injection will utilize a hydraulic <br /> fracturing technique. <br /> The French Camp Elevator is an active grain storage and transfer facility located approximately <br /> five miles south of Stockton, California in San Joaquin County. The site encompasses roughly <br /> nine acres and includes improvements such as grain elevators, grain storage bins, storage <br /> buildings,truck scales, and an office (Figure 1). <br /> Prior to 1980, liquid fumigants containing carbon tetrachloride were stored and used at the site. <br /> The fumigant was reportedly stored in five-gallon containers and no permanent tanks were ever <br /> used to store fumigant. Evidence of groundwater impact was uncovered during an <br /> environmental site assessment conducted in 1999 by QST Environmental. <br /> Between 1999 and 2001, consultants for ContiGroup Companies, Inc. (CGI) conducted a series <br /> of investigations designed to delineate the nature and extent of contamination in the subsurface <br /> underlying the site. ContiGroup began quarterly groundwater monitoring in 2001 in response to <br /> the Monitoring and Reporting Program issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board—Central Valley Region(RWQCB) on 15 December 2000. <br /> Data from the first half of 2002 showed reduced groundwater concentrations in groundwater <br /> samples collected from wells MW-3B and MW-4B; samples from these wells historically had <br /> the highest reported concentrations of carbon tetrachloride and chloroform at the site. To <br /> address this change in site conditions, Haley & Aldrich — with concurrence from RWQCB — <br /> implemented a groundwater extraction pilot test program. The pilot test was designed to <br /> evaluate the efficacy utilizing groundwater extraction to remediate portions of the aquifer known <br /> to be most impacted with carbon tetrachloride and chloroform. The pilot test was recently <br /> concluded and interpretations of the test results were presented in a March 2003 report (Haley & <br /> Aldrich, 2003). Briefly, we learned that pumping even a small volume of groundwater resulted <br /> in significant concentration reductions. However, because the sustainable pumping rate from <br /> any one well is low this approach would be expected to require a large number of extraction <br /> wells to be an effective full-scale strategy. Because of physical constraints at this active <br /> commercial facility, the likely ineffectiveness of the method, and the predicted high costs, <br /> groundwater extraction is not considered to be a preferred, nor potentially effective, option for <br /> this site. <br /> R9CONTGRAMCC14Cargilffrench Camp\Waste Discharge Application\supp info 6.29-04.doc <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.