Laserfiche WebLink
3. RESULTS <br /> Results of the May (pre-startup) and June (quarterly) sampling 18 June 2008 are presented in <br /> Tables 2, 3 and 5 and are also depicted in Figures 4, 6 and 8. Complete laboratory reports are <br /> presented in Appendix B. Table 7 summarizes the well construction characteristics including <br /> well screen intervals. For comparative purposes, cumulative potentiometric elevations are <br /> presented in Table 8 and cumulative groundwater results for selected VOCs from current and <br /> historic sampling events are included in Table 9. <br /> The groundwater recirculation pilot study was started on 19 May 2008 utilizing paired <br /> groundwater extraction and injection wells EW-11B and IW-BH2A and ran continuously <br /> through the end of the quarter. The extraction/injection flow rate was monitored weekly and <br /> maintained between the RWQCB required rate of 0.5 to 1.0 gallons per minute (GPM). <br /> 3.1 Groundwater Results <br /> During the June 2008 quarterly monitoring event, groundwater elevations in the intermediate <br /> wells varied from 10.50 and 11.56 ft below mean sea level. On average, water levels decreased <br /> by approximately 4.46 feet between the March 2008 and June 2008 quarterly sampling events. <br /> Based on the water level data collected on 18 June 2008, the ground flow direction appears to be <br /> moving away from a hydraulic mound interpolated to be in the vicinity of active injection well <br /> IW-BH2A and MW-9B. Historically, MW-9B has represented the highest water elevation on site <br /> and this pattern has continued. A hydraulic depression is interpolated to be in the vicinity of <br /> active extraction well EW-I 1B and monitoring well MW-4B. <br /> Historically, groundwater has been interpreted to flow to the northeast or northwest; however, <br /> the flow direction has been variable. The groundwater gradient in the intermediate aquifer ranged <br /> from 0.004 ft/ft and 0.01 ft/ft. <br /> Carbon tetrachloride was detected in all six monitoring wells sampled. Compared to the March <br /> 2008 event, carbon tetrachloride concentrations increased in four wells( MW- 4B, MW-5B, <br /> MW-9B, and MW-10B) and decreased in one well (MW-3B). The highest value of carbon <br /> tetrachloride detected was 860 gg/L in monitoring well MW-4B. Historically, the highest value <br /> of carbon tetrachloride recorded at the site was in May 2005 when a carbon tetrachloride <br /> concentration of 1,700 gg/L was detected at MW-9B. <br /> Chloroform was detected in all six monitoring wells sampled. Compared to the March 2008 <br /> event, chloroform concentrations increased in three wells (MW-5B, MW-9B, and MW-10B) and <br /> decreased in two wells (MW-3B and MW-4B). The highest value of chloroform detected was <br /> 140 gg/L in monitoring well MW-9B; historically the highest value of chloroform detected in the <br /> groundwater at the site was 220 µg/L on November 2005 and March 2006 at monitoring well <br /> MW-IOB. There were also low levels (less than 15 gg/1)of 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,2- <br /> 8 <br />