Laserfiche WebLink
4 Working to Restore Nature <br /> RESNA began monitoring the groundwater in wells MW-1 through MW-4 in October 1991 ' <br /> (RESNA, June 26, 1991, Report 30004-4). Well MW-S was added to the monitoring <br /> program in March 1993. Dissolved hydrocarbons have been detected in monitoring wells <br /> MW-1 and MW-5 since monitoring began. <br /> In March 1992, EA Engineering, Science,.Technology (EA) observed removal of the oil- <br /> water separator/clarifier (EA Engineering, Science and Technology, August 1992, Report <br /> 80633.01). EA collected one soil sample from beneath the former oil-water separator and <br /> one sample from the concrete. Analytical results from the soil samples indicated that oil <br /> and grease (quantified as total oil and grease [TOG]) were present. Concentrations of <br /> volatile organic compounds,semi-volatile organic compounds,and polychlorinated biphenyls <br /> were below detection limits. Metal concentrations were also below detection limits with the <br /> exception of arsenic and barium which were detected at concentrations of 0.0051 and 0.12 <br /> parts per million, respectively. <br />•' -On March 2, 1992, RESNA conducted a vapor extraction test at the site (RESNA, June 15, <br /> 1992, Report 30004-5). Results of the test indicated that soil beneath the site can be <br /> remediated by vapor extraction and the evaluated radius of influence was 30 feet. <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING, FIRST QUARTER 1994 <br /> Groundwater Technology, Inc. (GTI) Concord, California, was contracted by ARCO to <br /> conduct the field work at the site; GTI subsequently forwarded their field notes and the <br /> laboratory reports to RESNA. Field work included measuring depths to water and <br /> collecting groundwater samples for subjective and laboratory analyses. RESNA used these <br /> data to evaluate the direction and gradient of groundwater flow beneath the site. <br /> On April 8, 1994, a technician from GTI measured the depth to water and collected <br /> groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-6 for subjective and <br /> laboratory analyses. The field methods and procedures used are presented in an attachment <br /> to this report. The technician did not observe floating product or product sheen on samples <br /> collected from the wells (Table 1). <br /> The surveyed elevations of the top of casing and the depth-to-groundwater measurements <br /> (summarized in Table 1) were used to evaluate the potentiometric surface beneath the site. <br /> On April 8, 1994, the direction of groundwater flow was east with a gradient of <br /> approximately 0.002 (Plate 3). The direction of groundwater flow has generally been <br /> southeast since our investigation began. The groundwater surface has risen an average of <br /> 3.00 feet since the last monitoring event. <br /> Groundwater samples from each well were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and <br /> 4429=r/_VW4-11 2 <br />