di h�
<br /> CPT Interpretations
<br /> Table 2 References
<br /> No Reference
<br /> 1 Robertson,P K and Campanella,R G,1986,'Guidelines for Use,Interpretation and Application of the
<br /> CPT and CPTU",UBC Sal Mechanics Series No 105,Civil Eng Dept,Vancouver,B C,
<br /> Canada
<br /> 2 Robertson,P K,Campanella,R G Gillespie,D and Greig,J,1986,`Use of Piezometer Cone Data",
<br /> Proceedings of In-Situ 86,ASCE Specialty Conference,Blacksburg,Virginia
<br /> 3 Robertson,P K and Campanella R G 1989,'Guidelines for Geotechnical Design Using CPT and
<br /> CPTU',UBC,Soil Mechanics Series No 120,CnN Eng Det,Vancouver,B C,Canada
<br /> 4 Robertson,P K,1990,"Soil Classification Using the Cone Penetration Test,Canadian Geotechnical
<br /> Journal,Volume 27
<br /> 5 Robertson P K and Fear,C E,19% "Liquefaction of Sands and its Evaluation',Keynote Lecture,First
<br /> International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering,Tokyo,Japan
<br /> S Gregg In Situ Internal Report
<br /> 7 Robertson,P K and Wnde,C E,1997,"Cyclic Liquefaction and its Evaluation Based on SPT and CPT",
<br /> NCEER Workshop Paper,January 22,1997
<br /> 8 Wnde,C E and Robertson,P K,1997 'Phase 11 Data Review Report(Massey and Kidd Sites,Fraser
<br /> River Delta)", Volume 1 -Data Report(June 1997) University of Alberta
<br /> 9 Plewes,H D,Davies,M P and Jeffenes,M G 1992, "CPT Based Screening Procedure for Evaluating
<br /> Liquefaction Susceptibility',45th Canadian Geotechnical Conference,Toronto,Ontario,
<br /> October 1992
<br /> EGG
<br />
|