Laserfiche WebLink
S E C 0 R <br /> 76 Station No. 11193 <br /> August 13, 2004 <br /> Page 5 <br /> interim groundwater batch extraction performed from August 2000 through May 2003 has <br /> resulted in the reduction of MtBE within the source area, which is evidenced by decreasing <br /> MtBE trends in wells MW-1 R, MW-2R, and VW-1. During this time period, concentrations <br /> of MtBE in downgradient well MW-6 steadily increased since the initiation of interim <br /> remedial activities until August 2002, which suggests that this interim remedial alternative is <br /> limited in its effectiveness in controlling the migration of residual MtBE beneath the site. <br /> However, since August 2002, concentrations of MtBE have declined, which may suggest <br /> that interim groundwater batch extraction has resulted in reduced concentrations within the <br /> source area, and subsequent reductions in concentrations of MtBE that have potentially <br /> migrated off-site. Given the relatively flat east to northeast hydraulic gradient historically <br /> reported beneath the site, decreased concentrations of MtBE in the source area, interim <br /> groundwater batch extraction activities appear to have significantly influenced the extent <br /> and magnitude of the dissolved plume beneath and downgradient of the site. <br /> Though interim remediation via groundwater batch extraction appears to have effectively <br /> reduced concentrations of MtBE in the source area, MtBE and a significant amount TBA <br /> mass still remains within the source area. During interim groundwater batch extraction <br /> activities, concentrations of TBA have remained at elevated, yet stable levels. Since MtBE <br /> concentration trends appear to have become asymptotic as a result of groundwater batch <br /> extraction activities and elevated concentrations of TBA are present in source area wells <br /> MIA R, MW-21, and 1-1, SECOR proposed an alternate interim remedial action plan in <br /> the Revised Interim Remedial Action Plan and Work Plan for Ozone Sparge Well <br /> Installation and Additional Off-site Assessment dated September 15, 2003. The completed <br /> scope of work outlined in that work plan is presented below. <br /> COMPLETED SCOPE OF WORK <br /> To further expedite remediation of the dissolved plume beneath the site, SECOR <br /> discontinued the interim remediation via groundwater batch extraction on June 8, 2004. To <br /> prevent the further off-site migration of MtBE and TBA, SECOR installed 10 ozone sparge <br /> (OS) wells between March 31 and April 2, 2004 and an OS system was installed between <br /> April 26 and May 7, 2004 (Figure 2). With subsurface soils consisting predominantly of <br /> mixtures of silt and sand within the upper portion of the saturated zone (approximately 12 <br /> to 14 feet bgs), the introduction of ozone through several OS points will directly destroy <br /> dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons, MtBE, and TBA, and. stimulate in-situ aerobic <br /> biodegradation of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons by increasing subsurface oxygen <br /> concentrations. Though concentrations may initially increase due to the desorption of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons from soil caused by the aggressive mechanical scrubbing action <br /> of the ozone microbubbles, OS is capable of facilitating subsequent rapid degradation of <br /> the dissolved plume beneath the site. The installation of OS wells along the <br /> easternlnortheastern property boundary will act as a barrier, inhibiting further migration of <br /> dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons, MtBE, and TBA downgradient of the site. <br /> The off-Site monitoring wells (MW-11 and MWA2) that were proposed in the September <br /> 15, 2003 work plan will be installed later this summer and a separate report describing that <br /> work will be submitted upon completion. <br /> I:1ConocoPhillipslTosco Marketing1111931ReportslOzone Well install Rpt 6-04 recovered.doc <br />