My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS_FILE 1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
3250
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545251
>
WORK PLANS_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 10:21:36 AM
Creation date
1/31/2020 8:45:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545251
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0001877
FACILITY_NAME
AM PM HAMMER/I5 FOOD #83113
STREET_NUMBER
3250
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
08240009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3250 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
288
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Answers to Mass Balance Questions of June 30, 2003. <br /> 1 have some questions concerning the Mass Balance calculations found in the Work Plan for <br /> Additional Groundwater Assessment for the site as 3250 WesCHammer Lane in Stockton. This <br /> site is referred to as Parkinson's Hammer 1-5 Arco. I believe that the benzene concentration for <br /> MW-5 is incorrect. Instead of 3.4 ug/L,the benzene result should be less than 0.5 ug/L. Please <br /> correct the Zone 2 calculation based on this revision. <br /> If the benzene concentration in Zone 2 is changed to <0.5 ug/L, effectively eliminating Zone 2 <br /> from the sum of Total Dissolved Benzene, the mass of benzene remains 0.074 lbs when rounded <br /> off. Page 2 includes the Mass Balance Calculations with Zone 2 removed. <br /> Also, please explain the benzene concentrations of 760 ug/L for Zone 3 and 382 ug/L for Zone 4; <br /> and the MTBE concentrations of 10,335 ug/L for Zone 3,20,500 ug/L for Zones 4 and 5, and 12,050 <br /> ug/L for Zone 7 that are used in the Mass Balance calculation <br /> Regarding the benzene concentrations used in Zones 3 and 4,because Zone 3 is between the <br /> USTs and Zone 1, it was assumed to have a similar concentration as Zone 1, or 760 ug/l that was <br /> used for that zone. For Zone 4, an average of Zones 3 and 5, or 382 ug/L, was used. <br /> i <br /> Regarding the MtBE concentrations used, Zone 4 is an average concentration from wells MW-4 <br /> and MW-5 in that zone. Because Zone 5 is located between Zone 4 and the USTs, the <br /> concentration in Zone 4 was assumed to be present in Zone 5, For Zone 3, and average of Zones <br /> 2 and 4 was used, which should have been 10,635 instead of the 10,335 used. Page 3 includes <br /> revised MtBE calculations. Zone 7 is an average of Zones 5 and 6. <br /> I have corrected the first paragraph under the section titled Site Conceptual Model. The soil <br /> results should be reported in mg/kg, not ug/L. There were higher contaminant concentrations in <br /> the shallow soil found at three feet below the dispensers of 4450 mg/kg gasoline, 0.134 mg/kg <br /> benzene, and 179 mg/kg MTBE but this was not mentioned in your report. <br /> The Site Conceptual Model will be updated in the Final CPT Investigation Report, and will <br /> include revisions to this section that more accurately represent soil conditions beneath the site. <br /> I <br /> i <br /> A <br /> f <br /> V <br /> k <br /> i <br /> E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.