Laserfiche WebLink
fi . <br /> 3.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS <br /> The groundwater samples were transported to Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc. (STL), a state-certified <br /> laboratory, located in Pleasanton, California. The groundwater samples were analyzed as follows: <br /> ■ Well MW-1 R was analyzed for the presence of TPH-G, MTBE,DIPS, TAME, ETBE, TBA; <br /> ■ Wells MW-2, MW-5 and MW-8 were analyzed for the presence of TPH-G, BTEX, MTBE, <br /> DIPS, TAME, TBA, ETBE; <br /> �,. ■ Wells MW-3 and MW-10 were analyzed for the presence of MTBE; <br /> ■ Well MW-4 was analyzed for TPH-G, BTEX and MTBE; <br /> • Well MW-6 and MW-9 were analyzed for BTEX and MTBE; and <br /> +-• ■ Well MW-7 was analyzed for MTBE, DIPE, TAME, ETBE, and TBA. <br /> The selected analytical constituents were analyzed by US EPA Method 8260B. Copies of the laboratory <br /> �,. analytical report and chain of custody record are provided in Appendix C. <br /> 4.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS <br /> Based on the groundwater-level data for September 30, 2004 (Table 1), the groundwater flow direction in <br /> both the upper and lower aquifers was towards the southeast at gradients of approximately 0.002 feet per <br /> foot (ft/ft) (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The average depth to water in upper aquifer wells MW-5, MW-6, <br /> MW-7 and MW-10 increased approximately 0.88 feet since June 2004, and the average depth to water in <br /> the lower aquifer wells MW-1R, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-8 and MW-9 increased 0.82 feet during the <br /> 4. %%.r same time period. The groundwater flow directions and gradients noted during this sampling event are <br /> consistent withhistoricaltrends. + <br /> ,6(Sbft } ` KA� 1't U" <br /> Anal.- ' a'laboratoty results of groundwater samples collected on September 30, 2004 indicate that <br /> H-G as resent at a concentration of 660 micrograms per liter /L in upper aquifer monitoring <br /> P � P (pg/L) � PP 9 g <br /> well MW-5. TPH-G was also reported in lower aquifer wells MW-IR, MW-2 and MW-4 at <br /> concentrations of 81 gg/L, 62 gg/L and 130 gg/L, respectively. The reported gasoline concentrations <br /> were flagged by the laboratory for discrete peak in the gasoline range in wells MW-2 and MW-5, and for <br /> not matching the gasoline standard in wells MWAR and MW-4. BTEX compounds were reported below <br /> method detection limit concentrations in the sampled wells, except MW-4, where toluene was reported at <br /> a concentration of 1.7 gg/L. MTBE was reported in groundwater samples collected from upper aquifer <br /> wells MW-5 and MW-10 at concentrations of 570 gglL and 0.80 gg/L, respectively. MTBE was also <br /> reported in lower aquifer wells MW-IR, MW-2, and MW-9 at concentrations of 5.2 pg/L, 40 gg/L, and <br /> 1.5 pg/L, respectively. <br /> Fuel oxygenates DIPE, ETBE and TAME were not detected in groundwater samples collected from any <br /> +r of the monitoring wells sampled this quarter. However, TBA was reported in groundwater samples <br /> collected from wells MW-2 and MW-5 at concentrations of 550 gg/L and 450 gg/L, respectively. The <br /> next quarterly groundwater sampling is scheduled for December 2004. <br /> Analytical results of groundwater samples collected from current and past sampling events are presented <br /> in Tables I and 2. <br /> NOATC <br /> Quarterly GW Monitoring Report--3rd Qtr 2004 <br /> ulk Stop No. 132 <br /> Quik Stop Markets, Inc. <br /> ATC Project No. 75.62503.3205 <br /> November 23,2004 <br /> LN Page 2 of 3 <br />