Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br /> i <br /> 4. SUMMARY OF RESULTS <br /> A summary of the analytical results from current and past well sampling is presented in Table 1. Based on <br /> the water-level data for June 7, 1999, ATC Associates Inc. has interpreted the groundwater gradient and <br /> 1 flow directions for the upper aquifer, as shown on Figure 3. In the local upper aquifer (Monitoring Wells <br /> MW-5, MW-6 and MW-7), the groundwater level increased from the previous quarter an average of 0.39 <br /> feet, ranging from 0.28 feet in Monitoring Well MW-7, to 0.45 feet in Monitoring Well MW-6. The <br /> apparent groundwater flow direction in the local upper was southeasterly at a gradient of approximately <br /> ' 0.0037 (Figure 3). <br /> ' Based on the water-level data for June 7, 1999 (Table 1), ATC Associates Inc. has interpreted the <br /> groundwater gradient and flow directions for the lower aquifer, as shown on Figure 4. In the local lower <br /> aquifer (Monitoring Wells MW-1R, MW-2, MW-3 and MW4), the groundwater level increased from the <br /> ' previous quarter an average of 0.45 feet, ranging from 0.41 feet in Monitoring Well MW4 to 0.54 feet in <br /> Monitoring Well MW-3. The apparent groundwater flow direction in the local lower aquifer was <br /> ' southeasterly at a gradient of approximately 0.0037 (Figure 4). <br /> Laboratory analysis of the water sample collected on June 7, 1999 indicates that TPH-G and BTEX were <br /> not detected in groundwater samples collected from Monitoring Wells MW-1R, MW-3, MW-6, and MW- <br /> 7. TPH-G was detected in MW-2 and MW-5. Xylenes were only detected in Monitoring well MW4. <br /> ' Laboratory results of fuel oxygenate compounds by EPA Method 8260 indicates that MTBE was detected <br /> in the groundwater samples collected from Monitoring Wells MW-1R [100 micrograms per liter (ug/L)], <br /> ` MW-2 (8,400 ug/L), and MW-5 (2,900 ug/L). The water sample collected from Monitoring WeII MW-2 <br /> was analyzed for fuel oxygenates by EPA Method 8260 at two dilutions. The analytical results for the first <br /> dilution of 1:10 showed 5,200 (E) ug/L of MTBE, which exceeded the instrument calibration range, and <br /> 110 ug/L of TAME. The sample was then diluted to a 1:50 ratio and re-analyzed, showing a concentration <br /> ' of 8,400 ug/L of MTBE and non-detectable concentrations for the other oxygenates (detection limit 250 <br /> ug/L). Table 2 summarizes the quantifiable results of these two dilutions: the lowest values within the <br /> calibration range of the first dilution and the MTBE result from the second dilution is reported. TBA, <br /> DIPE, and ETBE were not detected in any of the groundwater samples. The next quarterly groundwater <br /> sampling is scheduled for the third quarter of 1999. <br /> 1 <br /> 1999 Second Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Repon <br /> HALEHRMAMQUIKS'I 8132\99rpt-2nd.docjAugua30.3999] <br /> 1 <br />