Laserfiche WebLink
ftunt�t!arrttil.. Thr T. IME Moro not Include ou:,h information AN the detection <br /> limits at which other cornpoundu 4jai•e+ Pint detf'rt+-al. 71,t? full tnv-t Of thr <br /> lAt-ornlora rrr4,rt will bf round in !if!ction Four of thin repert. <br /> GFtitrltAt. Al.)V1SORY ON POSITIVE ft F: LILTS <br /> Though nur firm sp-CriollZeN in sampling, monitoring anti doc+.imrntasion, rather <br /> than interpretation and remadiatlon, we have been asked by thl e,ntineering <br /> lktaff fir the fteglonal Water quality Control floord to Include In our report* <br /> an advisory aaction oettlining the general typm of additional ar,tionr which <br /> may be required wrhan cont.nminntlon Is found. This advisory iR not intended <br /> to characterize conditions at this particular cite or roplacn thv services of <br /> n consulting firm specializing In the Investigation, characterization and <br /> remediation of such conditions us may exist, Rather, It it Intended to <br /> e+dvise you that swich additional actions may be required even though some time <br /> may etapee before you are contacted by one of the lntnrejavd regulutdry <br /> agent{e s. <br /> In Region 1 (which to regulated by the Son Francisco Hcgioniil tater Quality <br /> Control board,} the thresholds aro readily defined In the lloorkl`s <br /> publication, PaLdjll—n—ea far 60dra� +� Fu_Sj LftS.lift. According to this <br /> document, molt which has less than loo parts per million total petroleum fuel <br /> hydrocarbon (TPII) contiAmination d,:�qs not generally require immediate <br /> additional action. Board engineers rmphosize that thin dors not mean thot <br /> steins action might not be required In the future. Still, the site Is ansignerd <br /> a law priority unless it is situated In an area of high hydtvSt-ologic <br /> concern. <br /> The detection or more thnn 1013 ppm TPH In the native soil hcnemh a tank Is <br /> gfenerally considered grounds for requiring an additional Investigation in the <br /> Corm of soil borings and InaWlation of at least one groundwater monitoring <br /> well followed by periodic monitoring. The detection of 10W ppm TPH is <br /> usually viewed by the Board as an unacceptable level or fuel saturatic"t which <br /> will mandate excavbtiOn of the effected ground down to the furthest <br /> practicable reach of conventional excavating machine�I followed by soil <br /> Wrings trod installation of groundwater monitoring <br /> tither regions use different standards for determining when n groundwater <br /> investigation will be required. For example benzene is nftnu ui.f:d in lieu of <br /> TPIT. Even very low levels of benzene are often seen as ground% for requiring <br /> a subsurface Investigation. This crIterir may be relaxed or atifraned <br /> depending on the location of the a <br /> systetns, the depth to water. typeotf aoil�a dotter car`Gfentrnti ntiuridnr watbenetfsne <br /> involved, <br /> The above standards apply only to funib. when sampler taken in connectlen <br /> with Awaste oil tank or b s,rtvearet tank are found to cunt_�in even small <br /> EPA.-pricrity--i►ol.lutant,c -til+ich as 'Ct_:_E* Pc:B, OCI� etc. <br /> which are detected by EPA mothOds 010, 130201 -- <br /> jitnndards are often applied. let these eases, soil borings and monitoring <br /> wt:11 installation may be raquirnd it there is any detectable amount of any Or <br /> :5hispling Hepnrt "05'f-t:.-1 Chevron 19113 SECTION �pJpesga 112 <br />