My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012715
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
45
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545259
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012715
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 5:57:11 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 2:43:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012715
RECORD_ID
PR0545259
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004966
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON USA (INACT)
STREET_NUMBER
45
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12707037
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
45 E HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
655
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. .s'"� _.•s.a .c. ..amu Z' �.� i -.a '. .,_� a <br /> 3Ya:: s - zs- 'e�Jitv'c- -. <br /> '-a e -�.' .?::k <br /> e - rg'g k✓�'aa+ a,.-- ....:.w�"`°^:v�-a.s�;F�.s,-Jrr.: �",.� �'3'`,.: k a:,�,�,��'a+..�$'-. ,�. at"t� :. # ?�� �a^r!��s '."��k4afmn.�. .,.�--f.°�:,n..,�'+,+.�.-���3 <br /> CEWrIFIFI) ANALYTICAL UPPORT <br /> The certified analytical report (CAR) generntod by the latwratory In the <br /> official document in which they Issue their findings. The Renuhn of <br /> Analyses section of the. TABLE OF SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Hhould correspond exnet)y with the Inbarutory'n CAR. Any discropuncy between <br /> nnalytical values should be decided in favor of tha CAR, for while It may, <br /> itself, be In error with regard to s particular number, the CAR remains the <br /> recognized document until ouch timo na It In amended with n corrected report. <br /> The certified nnnlyticnl report should atoo be reviewed when anmplern are <br /> taken from below wnate oil Lanka no aM detection or the EPA halogenated and <br /> purgeable: aromatic compounds may be grounds for requiring further action. <br /> Also the TABLE OF SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS In inaufficlently <br /> apacloua to allow anything more that a simple Biting of tbu detected <br /> compounds. The TABLE does not include much information as the detection <br /> limits at which other compounds were not dotected. The full text of the <br /> laboratory report will be found in Section Four of thin report. <br /> GENERAL ADVISORY ON POSITIVE RESULTS <br /> .i <br /> Though our firm specializes in sampling, monitoring and documentation, rather <br /> then interpretation and remediation, we have been asked by the engineering <br /> ataff of the Regional Water Quality Control Board to include In our reports <br /> an advisory section outlining the general type of additional actions which <br /> may be required when contamination is found. This advisory is not intended <br /> to characterize conditions at this particular aIle or replace the services of <br /> a consulting firm specializing in the Investigation, characterization and <br /> remediation of such conditions as may exist. Rather. it is intended to <br /> advise you that such additional actions may be required even though some time <br /> may elapse before you care contacted by one of the Interested regulatory <br /> agencles. <br /> In Region 2 (which in regulated by the San Francisca Regional Water Quality <br /> Control Board), the thresholds are readily defined in the Board's <br /> publication, Guidelinng For Adarenaln Fauei Leake. According to this <br /> _t documant, soil which has leas than 100 parts per million Ental petroleum fuel <br /> hydrocarbon (TPII) contamination does not generally require immediate <br /> additional action. Board engineers emphasize that this does not mean that <br /> some action might not be required in the future. Still, th.ft site is assigned <br /> a low priority unless It is situated in an area of high hydr�geologlc <br /> concern. <br /> The detection of more than 100 ppm TPH in the native soil beneath a tank is <br /> generally considered grounds for requiring an additional Investigation in the <br /> T - form-of_aoll-borings-and_instaltalion_of_at-ten et-one__groundwater-mo_nitoring_ <br /> well followed by periodic monitoring. The detection of 1000 ppm 'TPH Is ^- <br /> usually viewed by the Board as an unacceptable level of fuel saturation which <br /> will mandate excavation of the effected ground down. to the furthest <br /> practicable reach of conventional excavating machinery followed by sail <br /> boringa and installation of groundwater monitoring wells. <br /> Sampling Report 88342•-C-1 CHEVRON 1918 SECTION FIVE/usage 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.