Laserfiche WebLink
4/2/2019 Effect of C/N Ratio on the Removal of Nitrogen and Microbial Characteristics in the Water Saturated Denitrifying Section of a Two-Stage C... <br /> The mean concentration of ammonium in the second stage effluent was lower in the control T 1 (0.3 <br /> mg/L),than in T2 and T3 (0.4 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L,respectively). The removal percentages of NH4+-N <br /> reached up to 99.1%with only minor differences between the three experiments, indicating that the <br /> modeled CRI resulted in good overall ammonium removal and an increased C/N ratio in the second- <br /> stage influent contributed little to improve this. The removal of NH4+-N in this CRI mainly occurs <br /> through adsorption and nitrification,which take place in the first stage, so that alterations in conditions <br /> of the second stage have little effect. Moreover,as a result of the used setup, the denitrifying column <br /> provides a constant submerged environment,which restricts the nitrification reaction [5] that would <br /> otherwise convert ammonium to nitrate(Equation(1)). As a result,varying the carbon to nitrogen ratio <br /> in the influent of the second phase has no effect on the overall removal rate of ammonium. <br /> The nitrate in the effluent is mainly generated by nitrifying bacteria that oxidize ammonium during the <br /> dry phase [25]. As shown in Figure 4b, the mean concentration of NO3--N in the first-stage influent <br /> was only around 2.7 mg/L,but it was much higher in the effluent of the second stage. In the controrthe <br /> mean nitrate concentration reached 45 mg/L in second-stage effluent, accounting for 9,3% of the TN <br /> concentration. Thus,the nitrifying section of the CRI resulted in nearly complete nitrification of the <br /> available nitrogen, as a result of the employed dry-wet alternating operation mode. Since negatively <br /> charged nitrate is not adsorbed by dielectric particles that are mostly also negatively charged [26], it <br /> remained in solution and was efficiently flushed out with the water flow,resulting in high concentration <br /> of nitrate and TN in the effluent. Wang et al. [25] showed that an extension of the residence time of the <br /> denitrifying section could improve the denitrification capacity of a CRI, as it would allow bacteria <br /> more time for nitrogen conversion. We extended the retention time to 6.5 h in the second stage by <br /> constructing a permanent water-saturated environment. However,this did not significantly increase the <br /> removal efficiency of nitrate in second-stage effluent of T1. Hou et al. [2 7] reported that a C/N ratio <br /> less than 2 in influent provided insufficient amounts of carbon for denitrification,resulting in low TN <br /> removal in effluent. We found that an increase in C/N to 2:1 inesulted in average nitrate <br /> concentrations in the second-stage effluent o ArrigAt,which represents a decrease of 6.4 mg/L <br /> compared to the control T1. With the highest tested C/N ratio of 5:1 (in T3)the nitrate concentration <br /> decreased b compared to TI, so that only12.7 mg/L NO3--N remained in the second stage <br /> effluent. Thus,we confirmed that the denitrifying capacity of a CRI can be improved by adding an <br /> external carbon source to the water-saturated denitrifying section, in order to meet the energy demand <br /> of denitrifying bacteria. <br /> 3.2. Effect of C/N Ratio on Removal Efficiency of Total Nitrogen <br /> CRI has been shown to perform well for removal of COD,NH4+-N and SS,but under standard <br /> conditions the removal of TN is typically only around 10-30% [4]. This can be improved by an <br /> increased C/N ratio in the second stage influent, as shown in Figure 5. <br /> https://www.ncbi.nIm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069465/ 9/18 <br />