My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0080225 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST RIPON
>
12927
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0080225 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 4:33:54 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 2:52:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0080225
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
12927
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WEST RIPON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
22817008
ENTERED_DATE
2/20/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
12927 W WEST RIPON RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4/2/2019 Effect of C/N Ratio on the Removal of Nitrogen and Microbial Characteristics in the Water Saturated Denitrifying Section of a Two-Stage C... <br /> The mean concentration of ammonium in the second stage effluent was lower in the control T 1 (0.3 <br /> mg/L),than in T2 and T3 (0.4 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L,respectively). The removal percentages of NH4+-N <br /> reached up to 99.1%with only minor differences between the three experiments, indicating that the <br /> modeled CRI resulted in good overall ammonium removal and an increased C/N ratio in the second- <br /> stage influent contributed little to improve this. The removal of NH4+-N in this CRI mainly occurs <br /> through adsorption and nitrification,which take place in the first stage, so that alterations in conditions <br /> of the second stage have little effect. Moreover,as a result of the used setup, the denitrifying column <br /> provides a constant submerged environment,which restricts the nitrification reaction [5] that would <br /> otherwise convert ammonium to nitrate(Equation(1)). As a result,varying the carbon to nitrogen ratio <br /> in the influent of the second phase has no effect on the overall removal rate of ammonium. <br /> The nitrate in the effluent is mainly generated by nitrifying bacteria that oxidize ammonium during the <br /> dry phase [25]. As shown in Figure 4b, the mean concentration of NO3--N in the first-stage influent <br /> was only around 2.7 mg/L,but it was much higher in the effluent of the second stage. In the controrthe <br /> mean nitrate concentration reached 45 mg/L in second-stage effluent, accounting for 9,3% of the TN <br /> concentration. Thus,the nitrifying section of the CRI resulted in nearly complete nitrification of the <br /> available nitrogen, as a result of the employed dry-wet alternating operation mode. Since negatively <br /> charged nitrate is not adsorbed by dielectric particles that are mostly also negatively charged [26], it <br /> remained in solution and was efficiently flushed out with the water flow,resulting in high concentration <br /> of nitrate and TN in the effluent. Wang et al. [25] showed that an extension of the residence time of the <br /> denitrifying section could improve the denitrification capacity of a CRI, as it would allow bacteria <br /> more time for nitrogen conversion. We extended the retention time to 6.5 h in the second stage by <br /> constructing a permanent water-saturated environment. However,this did not significantly increase the <br /> removal efficiency of nitrate in second-stage effluent of T1. Hou et al. [2 7] reported that a C/N ratio <br /> less than 2 in influent provided insufficient amounts of carbon for denitrification,resulting in low TN <br /> removal in effluent. We found that an increase in C/N to 2:1 inesulted in average nitrate <br /> concentrations in the second-stage effluent o ArrigAt,which represents a decrease of 6.4 mg/L <br /> compared to the control T1. With the highest tested C/N ratio of 5:1 (in T3)the nitrate concentration <br /> decreased b compared to TI, so that only12.7 mg/L NO3--N remained in the second stage <br /> effluent. Thus,we confirmed that the denitrifying capacity of a CRI can be improved by adding an <br /> external carbon source to the water-saturated denitrifying section, in order to meet the energy demand <br /> of denitrifying bacteria. <br /> 3.2. Effect of C/N Ratio on Removal Efficiency of Total Nitrogen <br /> CRI has been shown to perform well for removal of COD,NH4+-N and SS,but under standard <br /> conditions the removal of TN is typically only around 10-30% [4]. This can be improved by an <br /> increased C/N ratio in the second stage influent, as shown in Figure 5. <br /> https://www.ncbi.nIm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069465/ 9/18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.