My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002658
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
45
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545259
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002658
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 5:06:46 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 3:15:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002658
RECORD_ID
PR0545259
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004966
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON USA (INACT)
STREET_NUMBER
45
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12707037
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
45 E HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 12, 1996 <br /> Page 5 <br /> October 1993. Chevron cleated a fate and transportmodel (October 13; 1493) to- <br /> predict the downgradient concentrations of dissolved benzene from Monitoring <br /> Well MW-I 1 (Attachment B) Well MW-1 1 had consistent benzene hits since its devel- <br /> opment in May 1992 until October 1993 The model used by Chevron estimated the half <br /> life of the dissolved benzene and the total migration distance for benzene from <br /> WeII MW-1 ], the most downgradient monitoring well on site Using the following <br /> assumptions, the velocity of groundwater, velocity bf benzene, distance of benzene <br /> impact from Well MW-I ], and the degradation rate for benzene were calculated The <br /> assumptions for the model were steady-state site conditions, no additional hydrocarbon <br /> mass added, and a constant degradationlattenuation rate <br /> The model was tested against actual groundwater data and found to be 95 percent accu- <br /> rate for Well MW-3, however the model predicted much lower benzene concentrations <br /> at Well MW-11 than were actually observed Chevron suggested that this may be due to <br /> another source area, possibly on oor off site <br /> The outcomes predicted by the model were as follows <br /> I The estimated distance downgradient from Well MW-I I to the <br /> 10 parts per billion (ppb) concentration contour would be 165 felt <br /> 2 The estimated time it would take to`degrade the initial dissolved <br /> benzene concentration in Well MW-11 (1,500 ppb) to 10 ppb would <br /> take 7,197 days or 20 4 years <br /> December 1993. Three 50-foot confirmatory soil borings (SB-1, SB-2, and SB;3) were <br /> drilled by GTI near the former I0,000-gallon gasoline UST complex to deterrmne the <br /> effectiveness of the S VE system (Figure 2) In addition, two 66 5-foot borings were <br /> drilled and converted to Wells MW-2R and MW-I4 to replace Well MW-2, and to <br /> further define the downgradient extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater, <br /> respectively Of the 30 soil samples collected, the maximum concentration of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons of 2,000 ppm,TPPH-g was reported at 25 feet bgs in Boring SB-2 and <br /> also at 30 feet bgs in Boring SB-3 No benzene was detected 1n any samples analyzed <br /> (Figure 2, Table 2) <br /> While drilling the boring for Well MW-2R, one additional unknown UST was encoun- <br /> tered at a depth of approximately 4 feet bgs near the southeast corner'of the site <br /> (Figure 2) GTI retained Spectrum Environmental Services, Inc to conduct a geophysi- <br /> cal survey of the former service station property in an effort to locate other USTs that <br /> were not identified previously No other USTs were found during their investigation <br /> March 1994. Touchstone Developments excavated and removed one I,000-gallon UST <br /> and associated product piping from the site One soil sample was collected at 8 5 feet <br /> 3201337MCLOSUiLE2 yt <br /> � I <br /> i. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.