Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 REMEDIAL. ACTION REQUIREMENTS <br /> To identify remedial action requirements and develop remedial objectives, current site condi- <br /> tions are compared to those necessary to achieve the site-specific goals outlined in the previ- <br /> ous section Where goals are achieved, remedial action is not required, conversely, where <br /> goals are not achieved, action may be required In this section, remedial action requirements <br /> are specified <br /> On January 23, 1995, groundwater quality within an area defined by Wells MW-2R, MW-10, <br /> MW-12, MW-13, and MW-14 did not meet water quality goals For example, dissolved <br /> benzene concentrations were detected in groundwater samples collected from Wells MW-11 <br /> and MW-13 at levels greater than the water quality goal of 1 0 ppb It is also important to <br /> note that dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations are attenuating and are relatively low Based <br /> on recent water quality data, some form of remedial action will considered to achieve water <br /> quality goals At minimum, action is required to finish plume delineation, determine if <br /> migration is a factor, and monitor dissolved plume containment and ultimately restore <br /> groundwater quality to background conditions <br /> With regard to vertical residual plume movement, any potential threat to comprorruse site <br /> water quality goals, as they apply to deep groundwater bodies, appears negligible This asser- <br /> tion is based on the fact that soil samples taken at the maximum depth for each soil boring <br /> installed to date show compliance with proposed soil-based groundwater quality goals In <br /> addition, the same attenuation mechanisms that may be stabilizing the dissolved plume in a <br /> lateral sense, work in the vertical sense as well It does not appear action addressing vertical <br /> migration is necessary at this time <br /> A review of soil chemistry data (December 1993, June 1995) generated as a result of tnvesti- <br /> gatvon activities indicate that leachable hydrocarbon concentrations still exist in soils beneath <br /> the site The TPPH-g concentrations in soil, as characterized by boring data generated in <br /> 1995, suggest hydrocarbon concentrations in soil still threaten groundwater The greater <br /> burdon of soil contamination occurs in the zone closer to the water table, considering that <br /> prior interim remedial measures effectively targeted shallower soils As such, soil-based <br /> action is required <br /> • 3201337B/CAP AMID DOC 12 November 30, 1995 <br />