My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAZELTON
>
2025
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505804
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 5:51:48 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 3:57:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0505804
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007013
FACILITY_NAME
KOPPEL STOCKTON TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
2025
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAZELTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2025 W HAZELTON AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms . Wendy Wyels <br /> February 21 , 1995 <br /> Page 2 <br /> primarily liable, the RWQCB should unequivocally be pursuing <br /> the former owner and operator of the Koppel Stockton <br /> Terminal. <br /> Second, the mere existence of fertilizers on the site <br /> does not mean that there is soil and groundwater <br /> contamination. To say that every industrial property is <br /> contaminated is overbroad. Also, please note that liquid <br /> fertilizer was not handled on this site at any time after <br /> MUNCO purchased the property. The tank you mentioned in <br /> your letter was used strictly as a water tank. No liquid <br /> fertilizers were stored on site. <br /> Third, in your letter you mentioned that at a site in <br /> the Sacramento area, you " feel that any level over 250 ppm <br /> nitrogen may impact water quality, " yet, then you set the <br /> threshold for this site at 200 ppm total nitrogen. It is <br /> our opinion that the RWQCB needs to be consistent; <br /> therefore, the threshold for further investigation and <br /> testing at the Koppel Stockton Terminal should be 250 ppm <br /> total nitrogen. <br /> As stated before, our client desires to cooperate with <br /> the Regional Board. Therefore, the Regional Board will be <br /> permitted entry on to the property for the purpose of <br /> collecting soil samples from around the load-in and load-out <br /> areas , and water samples from the pond, and if necessary a <br /> groundwater sample. Our client desires to have his <br /> consultant, Roy F. Weston, Inc . , present during the <br /> sampling. In addition, we hereby request that the Regional <br /> Board split the samples so that Roy F . Weston, Inc . can <br /> likewise analyze the samples. Entry onto the property is <br /> conditioned upon the above two requests . <br /> Please schedule the testing with Paul Sundberg at <br /> Weston (209) 476-1635 . As always , should you have any <br /> questions or comments , please do not hesitate to call. <br /> Sincer ly yours , 0 <br /> 07 f <br /> S. GOLDBERG <br /> Attorney at Law <br /> LSG:ect <br /> cc: Ms. Diane Hinson <br /> Mr. Dan Munzer <br /> Mr. Paul Sundberg <br /> 28722-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.