Laserfiche WebLink
✓Y f NEUMILLER & BEARDSLEE <br /> f A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION•ATTORNEYS&COUNSELORS ESTABLISHED 1903 <br /> 58953-21778 <br /> LEAH S. GOLUBERC <br /> STOCKFON OFFICE: <br /> 509 W.WEBER AvE. <br /> STOCKTON,CA December 28 , 1994 <br /> 95203-3166 <br /> (209)948-8200 <br /> (209)948-9910 Fax y3olyXV <br /> MAILING ADDRESS:P.O.Box 20 <br /> STocKroN,CA Ms . Wendy Wyels <br /> 95201-3020 California Regional Water DEC 2 9 1994 <br /> MODESTO Quality Control Board ENVIRO <br /> (209)577-8200 3443 Routier Road, Suite A PRONMSERVICESLTH <br /> (209)577-4910 FAx Sacramento, California 95827-3098 <br /> rr <br /> Re: Koppel Stockton Terminal <br /> Dear Ms. Wyels: <br /> We represent the owner of the Koppel Stockton <br /> Terminal located at 2025 West Hazelton in Stockton, <br /> California. On August 29 , 1994 , the Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board issued a Request for an <br /> Investigation on the above referenced site. The Request <br /> states in pertinent part: "The County Air Pollution <br /> Control District made numerous air quality citations as <br /> they observed fertilizer particles and dust being released <br /> during loading operations. " Pursuant to a Public Records <br /> Act request, the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution <br /> Control District conducted a thorough review of the files <br /> and was unable to locate or identify the alleged <br /> citations . <br /> One Notice of Violation ( "NOV" ) was issued at the <br /> site for visible dust emissions . The NOV was not issued <br /> as a result of or in relation to loading fertilizers as <br /> stated in your August 29 , 1994 , letter. The NOV, a copy <br /> of which is attached for your information, was issued to <br /> Delgado & Associates Construction on April 22 , 1992 , for <br /> visible dust. As you will see from the field notes and <br /> other documentation, the dust was a result of cleaning the <br /> facility after the fertilizer operations ceased and in <br /> between tenants. The NOV was issued to the contractor who <br /> was sandblasting the facility and not to the owner or <br /> operator of the fertilizer business . This NOV was not <br /> related to the fertilizer loading operation. Moreover, <br /> the emissions were not identified as fertilizer particles <br /> or nitrates . <br /> If the Regional Water Quality Control Board has <br /> information not contained in the San Joaquin Valley <br /> Unified Air Pollution Control District files, we would <br /> 25134-1 <br />