Laserfiche WebLink
...001 <br /> High TECH ENTERPRISES <br /> rameters, and Conversion Factors that were used to develop these solvent volumes have been listed on <br /> below. -- <br /> Assumptions: <br /> 1. The septic tank on this property has a capacity of 1,200 gallons. <br /> 2. This septic tank was fillet to 50%of its capacity at the time of its sampling(i.e., it contained 600 <br /> gallons of septic fluid). <br /> 3. A single drop of water has an approximate volume of 0.0156 cubic centimeters (using as a ref- <br /> erence: Elements of Physical Chemistry, by Samuel Glasstone, published by D. Van Nosrand <br /> Company,Inc., which states that approximately 64 drops of water are required to produce a vol- <br /> ume of 1 cubic centimeter= 1 milliliter). <br /> Tabulation of the Physical Parameters and the Conversion Factors involved: <br /> 1. The densities of the five chemicals found to have been present in this septic tank are as follows: <br /> ethyl benzene [p =0.867 gms/cm3], toluene [p =0.865 gms/cm3], m-xylene [p =0.950 <br /> gms/cm3], p-xylene [p = 0.866 gms/cm3], &p-isopropyltoluene [p = 0.860 gms/cm3]. <br /> 2. 1 gallon= 3.785 liters; therefore, 600 gallons=2,271 liters. <br /> The goal of the following calculation is to provide an estimate of the volume of each of these chemi- <br /> cals that would have been required to produce the laboratory determined concentrations found in this <br /> septic tank. The formula is as follows: <br /> tank concentration, µgms/liter)(2,271 liters/tank) <br /> Solvent Volume, in drops = <br /> solvent density, gms/cms)(106 µgms/gm)(0.0156 cm3/drop <br /> On the basis of: (1) the relationship listed immediately above, (2)the lab concentration results, (3) the <br /> three assumptions;(4)the physical density parameters of the five chemicals,and(5)the conversion <br /> factor for gallons to liters, the following tabulation lists the volume of each of these five chemicals— <br /> again in drops (as from an eye dropper)—that would have to have been added to each septic tank in <br /> order to have produced the concentrations that were determined by GeoAnalytical Labs. <br /> Table#2—Solvent Volumes in the Septic Tank, listed in "drops" <br /> No. Analyte Volume <br /> 3 ethyl benzene 0.4 drops <br /> 4 toluene 494.8 drops/7.7 cc <br /> 5 m-xylene(50%) 0.2 drops <br /> 6 p-xylene (50%) 0.2 drops <br /> 7 p-isopropyltoluene 2.5 drops <br /> From the perspective of the equivalent volumes of solvents that were measured to have been present in <br /> this half full septic tank,it is extremely impressive how remarkably sensitive the EPA 8260B proce- <br /> dure is! As stated earlier, in my judgment,these concentrations are insignificant and require no addi- <br /> tional remediation or monitoring whatsoever. <br /> Should you have any questions on any of the data, or the conclusions of this Report, please do not <br /> hesitate to contact me. Thank you very much for permittin me to be of service to you in this matter. <br /> - <br /> CSP'' <br /> Sincerely, <br /> � <br /> W.FjNGEdward W.W.Finucane,PE, QEP, CSP, CIH 49 No.13749 <br /> EWF wf Exp:12-31-2005 :'EpHjjylyplN,FINUCANE <br /> g aunn fine I- - - ! <br /> xc: Alan Biedermann,R. E. H. S. *s?'FOHAN�cP��P ��•`�`pppO OF 1, `0 9517 �0 2�� <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services 9�OFCA��FO� \y /� <br /> CERT NO. <br /> • ��� 3743 ,�•��\`\ <br /> VW*• <br />