Laserfiche WebLink
' 07 December 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 98-0448 <br />' Page 8 of 9 <br />' Ground water elevation data collected on 03 September 2004 did not suggest that ground <br /> water mounding was occurring due to air spargmg at the site (Figure 3) <br /> • Ground water flow direction at the site was toward the southwest, the ground water gradient <br />' was estimated to be approximately 0 013 ft/ft (Figure 3) <br /> • The September 2004 concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons detected in the samples <br />' collected from wells MW-2 and MW-4A indicate that these wells are still within the <br /> dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon"core area"of the plume(Figure 4), lesser concentrations <br /> were detected from wells MW-1 and MW-6 and are probably representative of the south and <br />' west margins of the plume <br /> • Generally, an overall apparent trend of decreasing dissolved petroleum concentrations is <br /> evident in water samples collected from wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-4A and MW-4B, the <br /> trend of decreasing concentrations may be attributed to the air sparge activities being <br /> performed at wells AW-1 through AW-5 and MW-4B (Table 3) <br />' Between August 1998 and May 2002 (fourteen consecutive quarters), well MW-6 had <br /> detected TPH-g and/or BTEX at concentrations as high as 480 µg/1, thereafter, dissolved <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected at MW-6 between August 2002 and July 2004 <br /> • (eight consecutive quarters), however, low concentrations of TPH-g, toluene,"ethylbenzene <br /> and xylenes were once again detected at MW-6 during the September 2004 monitoring event <br /> The September 2004 TPH-g/BTEX detections at MW-6 are still within the range of <br /> hydrocarbons that were previously detected and are most likely the result of a slight shift in <br /> the margin of the ground water plume towards the south <br />' Based on SVE/IAS remediation data collected between 22 July 2004and 23 September 2004,AGE <br /> concludes <br />' The volume of hydrocarbons extracted b the SVE system was calculated to be <br /> • Y Y Y , <br />' approximately 71 pounds during the third quarter 2004, or equivalent to an approximate <br /> volume of 10 8 gallons of gasoline extracted (Appendix F) <br />- - The average SVE inlet flow rate was estimated to '6&-2 3 cubic feef per rnmute(C-fin)at an <br />' average differential pressure of 0 23 inches of water(Table 6) <br /> • Since initiation ofthe SVE system(April 2001),the total volume ofpetroleum hydrocarbons <br />' extracted is estimated to be approximately 281 gallons (Table 7) <br /> • The SVE system appears to have extracted the majority of the available adsorbed soil <br /> contamination, as based on the decline trend in vapor samples collected <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentai,Inc <br /> ' r <br /> y <br />