Laserfiche WebLink
(T <br /> ATC Associates Inc <br /> 1117 Lone Palm Avenue, Suite B <br /> Modesto, California 95351 <br /> 209-579-2221 <br />• Fax 209-579-2225 <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> concentrations of 41 pg/L, 38 µg/L, 21 µg/L, 29 µg/L, and 44 pg/L, respectively 1,2-DCA was <br /> detected in the groundwater samples collected from MWl through MW7 at concentrations ranging <br /> from 4 0 pg/L to 68 gg/L <br /> The Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for benzene, 10 pg/L, was exceeded in the groundwater <br /> sample collected from MW2 The MCL for MTBE, 13 µg/L, was exceeded In the groundwater <br /> samples collected from MW 1, MW2, MW3, MW4, and MW7 The MCL for 1,2-DCA, 0 5 µg/L, <br /> was exceeded in the groundwater samples collected from all of the monitoring wells The California <br /> Drinking Water Notification Level for TBA, 12 gg/L, was exceeded to the groundwater samples <br /> collected from MW1, MW2, MW3,MW6, and MW7 A summary of the laboratory analytical data is <br /> presented in Table 2 A copy of the laboratory analytical report is included in Attachment 2 An <br /> isoconcentratlon map depicting MTBE concentrations in the groundwater samples collected during <br /> the fourth quarter 2005 is shown on Figure 4 <br /> ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES <br /> On November 17 and 18, and December 5 and 28, 2005, an ATC geologist supervised the <br /> advancement of five soil bonngs, S139 through SB 13 The bonngs were advanced for the <br /> purposes of evaluating the horizontal extent of petroleum impacted soil and groundwater <br /> surrounding the site Details of these activities are summarized in ATC's Summary Report of <br /> Additional Subsurface Investigation, dated July 12, 2006 <br /> GEOTRACKER DATA UPLOAD <br /> The depth to water and the laboratory data were submitted electronically to the State Water <br /> Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Geotracker database (confirmation numbers 6329806268 and <br /> 3993945002, respectively) Documentation of the data submittal is contained in Attachment 3 <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> Groundwater flow direction and gradient are generally consistent with previous sampling events <br /> Water table elevations have decreased since the July 2005 monitoring event The laboratory <br /> analytical results of the groundwater samples collected from MW1 through MW7 are generally <br /> similar to the results of the groundwater samples collected from these wells in July 2005 TPHg <br /> decreased In groundwater samples collected from MWl through MW7 while BTEX concentrations <br /> remained fairly consistent with respect to recent sampling events TPHg and BTEX remain <br /> undetected In groundwater samples collected from MW4 <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the results of the fourth quarter 2005 monitoring event, we recommend continued quarterly <br /> groundwater monitoring and evaluating remedial action alternatives for the site <br /> s lenvironmenta1122493aeponsl4QR-05 doe 4 <br />