My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARLAN
>
15600
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545273
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2020 12:18:49 PM
Creation date
2/3/2020 11:05:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0545273
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0000174
FACILITY_NAME
JOES TRAVEL PLAZA
STREET_NUMBER
15600
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
HARLAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19620079
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
15600 S HARLAN RD
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U <br /> Response to SJCEHD's 8-19-08 Letter--Page 5 <br /> Joe's Travel Plaza,15600 S.Harlan Road <br /> not cost-effective; AS/SVE not technically viable due to limited vadose. Ozone injection not <br /> evaluated. Recommended remedial alternative: oxygen injection focused along MTBE plume <br /> axis at the property boundary. <br /> o January 2007 — SJCEfiD letter encouraged batch groundwater extraction be evaluated. ERG <br /> included this approach in their TRAP (submitted sometime in early May 2007 [Stratus does not <br /> have copy]). <br /> o May 2007 — SJCEHD reviewed IRAP but did not approve; stated that high costs difficult to <br /> justify for interim action, also USTCFpre-approval would be needed. SJCEHD suggested that <br /> costs to perform groundwater extraction for shorter period of time (Le one week per month) be <br /> evaluated. <br /> The plume is not defined to the north (water samples from MW 15A still have detections of MTBE) <br /> ).12 <br /> nor to the northwest(last sample from MW13AB was 110 Rg/t <br /> 12 See Comment No. 7 above. Well MW-15A has shown a 96.8% decrease in MTBE <br /> concentrations from its highest level of 71.8 ug/L (March 2007) to its current concentration of 2.3 ug/L <br /> (September 2008). The primary and secondary MCLS for MTBE are 13 and 5.0 Rg/L, respectively, thus, <br /> MW-15A, which was a significant cause of concern in EHD's August 19, 2008 letter has subsequently <br /> achieved regulatory compliance through.natural attenuation. We fully expect that given time, Well MW- <br /> 13A/B will do the same. As an example, please refer to.the Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report, <br /> Third Quarter 2008, Table 1. As shown in Table 1, MTBE concentrations at this site have historically <br /> fluctuated by as much as an order of magnitude before continuing a steady downward trend. The <br /> following excerpts from Table 1 show fluctuating (and ultimately downward trending) MTBE <br /> concentrations in a number of wells: <br /> Well Date MTBE <br /> (ug&) <br /> MW-1 2/12/00 240 <br /> 4/28/00 2,800 <br /> 9/20/00 160 <br /> 12/27/00 150 <br /> 7/30/01 40 <br /> 9/10/08 4 <br /> MW-2 8/29/02 44 <br /> 12/10/02 400 <br /> 3/28/03 1,300 <br /> 5/21/03 250 <br /> 9/15/03 13 <br /> -12/19/03 960 <br /> ... 9/10/08 45 <br /> MW-3 12/10/02 190 <br /> 3/28/03 550 <br /> 5/21/03 240 <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.