Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING REPORT <br /> =' BP Oil Company Service Station No. 11195 <br /> 16500 South Interstate 5 <br /> Lathrop, California <br /> Project No. 10-151-06-002 <br /> February 16, 1998 <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> This report presents the results and findings of the January 15, 1998 groundwater monitoring <br /> and sampling conducted by Alisto Engineering Group at BP Oil Company Service Station <br /> No. 11195, 16500 South Interstate 5, Lathrop, California. A site vicinity map is shown on <br /> Figure 1. <br /> FIELD PROCEDURES <br /> Field activities were performed in accordance with the procedures and guidelines of <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services and the California Regional Water Quality <br /> Control Board, Central Valley Region. <br /> f` Before purging and sampling, the groundwater level in each well was measured from a <br /> permanent mark on top of the casing to the nearest 0.01 foot using an electronic sounder. <br /> The depth to groundwater and top of casing elevation data were used to calculate the <br /> groundwater elevation in each well in reference to mean sea level. The survey data.and <br /> groundwater elevation measurements collected to date are presented in Table 1. <br /> Before sample collection, each well was purged of 3 casing volumes while recording field <br /> readings of pH, temperature, electrical conductivity, and dissolved oxygen. Groundwater <br /> samples were collected for laboratory analysis by lowering a bottom-fill, disposable bailer to <br /> just below the water level in the well. The samples were transferred from the bailer into <br /> laboratory-supplied containers. The water sampling field survey forms are presented in <br /> Appendix A. <br /> SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The results of monitoring and laboratory analysis of the groundwater samples for this and <br /> previous quarters are summarized in'Table 1. The potentiometric groundwater elevations as <br /> calculated from the results of this monitoring event are shown on Figure 2. Groundwater <br /> elevations ranged from 3.72 to 3.78 foot above mean sea level, therefore groundwater <br /> gradient contours were not prepared. The results of groundwater analysis are shown on <br /> Figure 3. The laboratory report and chain of custody record are presented in Appendix B. <br />