My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2011 REVISED FEASABILITY STUDY
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
230
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009051
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2011 REVISED FEASABILITY STUDY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 2:26:35 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 10:37:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2011 REVISED FEASABILITY STUDY
RECORD_ID
PR0009051
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0000649
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER NESTLE USA INC FACILITY
STREET_NUMBER
230
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
25938001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
230 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
05
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
amec�9 <br /> system would have limited near-term effect on groundwater impacts located outside of the <br /> proposed treatment area. Therefore, the effectiveness of groundwater recirculation towards <br /> minimizing the risk to downgradient receptors is low because COC-affected groundwater <br /> exists beyond the alignment of the proposed recirculation system. Intrinsic remediation would <br /> be required to manage the risk of COC impacts to receptors downgradient of the barrier. <br /> 3.3 IMPLEMENTABILITY <br /> The overall size of the proposed system represents a substantial implementation challenge. <br /> The total alignment length for the proposed system is 12,000 feet (2.3 miles). Due to the <br /> length of the alignment (2.3 miles) and the total treatment flow rate (2.88 MGD), the system <br /> could potentially require multiple treatment compounds located at different locations along the <br /> alignment as opposed to one centralized treatment compound. The large total flow rate for the <br /> system (2.88 MGD) is due primarily to the amount of recharge in the proposed treatment area <br /> from the WWTF lagoons (approaching 2 MGD). The re-injection of 2.88 MGD of treated <br /> groundwater would present a substantial operation and maintenance burden and rapid <br /> clogging of the injection well screens could seriously interfere with the operation such that the <br /> system cannot perform as designed. Therefore, the proposed system does not appear to be <br /> implementable. <br /> 3.4 COST <br /> A feasibility level cost estimate for the groundwater recirculation system described above is <br /> included in Table B.3-1. Supporting calculations and assumptions for the unit costs in Table <br /> B.3-1 are provided in Table B.3-2. Several of the unit costs for this cost estimate were <br /> obtained from the Remedial Action Cost Engineering and Requirements software program <br /> (RACER). <br /> As shown in Table B.3-1, the total cost to construct the groundwater recirculation system <br /> would be approximately $4.4 million. The annual operation and maintenance (O&M) costs are <br /> estimated to be $4.3 million for a 30 year net present value of$53.7 million (note that the non- <br /> discounted O&M costs amount to $130 million). The total cost for installation of the P&T <br /> system and 30 years of discounted O&M costs is $58.8 million. <br /> The design basis for the P&T system is based on the following assumptions: <br /> • The presumed location of the P&T alignment (based on existing monitoring data) is <br /> shown in Figures B.3-1; it is assumed that the length of the alignment will be <br /> approximately 12,000 feet to a total depth of 135 feet bgs. <br /> • Pre-construction costs include engineering design and legal/permitting costs, which are <br /> assumed to be 8% and 5% of capital costs respectively. Pre-construction costs are <br /> estimated to be $543,700. <br /> AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. <br /> \\oad-fs1\doc_safe\9000s\9837.006\4000 REGULATORYTS Assessment_Apx B_012711\Attachment B.3\Attach B-3.docx 133-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.