Laserfiche WebLink
Table 3:Comparative Matrix of Remedial Alternatives <br /> 2011 Revised Feasibility Study <br /> Former Nestle USA,Inc.Facility <br /> Ripon,CA <br /> Alternative 1: Alternative 2: Alternative 3: Alternative 4: <br /> No Action Expand Pump-and-Treat, Pump-and-Treat, Pump-and-Treat, <br /> Institutional Controls, In-situ Source Removal, focused In Situ Source <br /> Monitored Intrinsic Institutional Controls, Removal if appropriate, <br /> Remediation Monitored Intrinsic Institutional Controls, <br /> Remediation Monitored Intrinsic <br /> Remediation <br /> Does not adequately protect Protection of human health Protection of human health Protection of human health <br /> potential receptors and the environment achieved and the environment achieved and the environment achieved <br /> Overall Protection of Human under this alternative. under this alternative. under this alternative. <br /> Health and the Environment <br /> The rate of reduction in Reduction in mobility and Reduction in toxicity,mobility Reduction in toxicity,mobility <br /> toxicity,mobility,and plume volume are achieved by and volume are achieved by in and volume are achieved by <br /> Reduction in Toxicity, volume is likely slower. removing and treating situ chemical treatment and targeted pump-and treat and <br /> Mobility,and Volume groundwater. removing and treating contingency in-situ chemical <br /> groundwater. treatment. <br /> Not effective in the short term. Effective in short-term by Effective in short-term by Effective in short-term by <br /> containing the source and containing the source and containing the source and <br /> Short-Term Effectiveness protecting receptors through removing COC mass. removing COC mass. <br /> institutional control. Receptors protected through Receptors protected through <br /> institutional controls. institutional controls. <br /> COC concentrations remain Effective long-term. Time to Effective long-term. Effective long-term. <br /> above RAOs for reach RAO's is longer in <br /> approximately 75 years.Not comparison to Alternative 3 <br /> Long-Term Effectiveness as effective in long term due and 4. <br /> to lack of potential receptor <br /> protection. <br /> RAO's are met after 75 years RAO's are met in 35 years RAO's are met in 12 years RAO's are met in 12 to 15 <br /> of natural attenuation based based on current modeling based on current modeling years based on current <br /> Achievement of Remedial on current modeling results. results. results. modeling results. <br /> Action Objectives <br /> No activity to implement. Implementability is difficult Implementability is moderate Implementability is optimal <br /> relative to Alternatives 3 and 4 relative to Alternatives 2 and 4 relative to Alternatives 2 and 3 <br /> due to: due to: due to: <br /> -Selection of well locations -In-situ treatment may -In-situ treatment(if <br /> -Property access produce toxic products in necessary)may produce toxic <br /> Implementability -Conveyance of greater groundwater which require products in groundwater which <br /> volume of extracted and further treatment require further treatment <br /> treated groundwater from -In-situ treatment of multiple <br /> multiple locations (Upper and Intermediate) <br /> -Disposal of greater volume of aquifers and locations <br /> treated groundwater presents technical challenges <br /> Cost <br /> (excluding regular <br /> groundwater monitoring and $0 $45,401,000 $9,616,000 $3,709,000 to$7,921,00 <br /> ongoing project management <br /> costs) <br />