Laserfiche WebLink
Program R5-2010-08104 (MRP) issued April 19, 2010. This MRP supersedes the 2005 MRP <br /> (R5-2005-0829). <br /> The RWQCB issued an initial Cleanup and Abatement Order (CAO) in 1993. The 1993 the <br /> CAO directed Nestle to submit a Remedial Investigation Report (RIR)5 and a Feasibility Study <br /> (FS) report6. Nestle submitted these documents in 1994 as directed, but the RWQCB has <br /> neither approved nor rejected them'. On January 30, 2009, Nestle submitted a revised FS8 to <br /> the RWQCB, who commented on the report via a letter dated May 7, 2009. On October 16, <br /> 2009, ECM submitted the 2009 Revised FS9 addressing RWQCB's May 7, 2009 comments. <br /> Following the submittal of the 2009 Revised Feasibility Study (FS) report, the RWQCB <br /> requested additional information regarding the need for detailed evaluation of remediation <br /> technologies for all zones impacted by the presence of COCs onsite and offsite, and justification <br /> for screening out certain remediation technologies from further evaluation in the vicinity of the <br /> City of Ripon WWTP. ECM submitted the 2011 Revised FS report10 to the RWQCB on January <br /> 28, 2011 which included all components of the recommended remedial action plan and source <br /> controls. <br /> In 2012, as a component of the remedial action recommended in the 2011 Revised FS, ECM <br /> submitted a draft Water Management Plan (WMP) to the City of Ripon for review and comment. <br /> Upon review, representatives of the City of Ripon responded that the City of Ripon ordinances <br /> are consistent with the objectives of the draft WMP, but the City of Ripon declined any more <br /> formal commitment to the concepts in the draft WMP. <br /> In 2003, the RWQCB proposed revisions to the 1993 CAO. After several comments and <br /> revisions over an extended period of time, the RWQCB finalized the CAO in July 2006. Some <br /> of the requirements in the CAO have been challenged, and the State Water Resources Control <br /> Board has accepted a petition to hold the CAO in abeyance until further notification, such that <br /> the parties can reasonably negotiate the terms of the CAO. <br /> Other regulatory authorities involved with this project are the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department, Stanislaus County Environmental Resources, San Joaquin <br /> Unified Air Pollution District, and the City of Ripon. <br /> A1.5 SOIL VAPOR INVESTIGATION <br /> Nestle investigated soil gas in 1987", 198912, 199113, and 199514 to delineate the vadose zone <br /> source and for remediation planning. The details of the investigations and remedial action taken <br /> based on the investigation results were discussed in other reports15,16,17 submitted to the <br /> RWQCB. <br /> Because soil gas investigations indicated that the highest concentrations of volatile organic <br /> compounds (VOCs), primarily TCE, in soil and groundwater were present near the Industrial <br /> and Stockton Avenue properties, ECM investigated the potential for vapor intrusion into <br /> residential, commercial and industrial buildings in 2007 and 2008 on behalf of Nestle. ECM <br /> conducted shallow soil gas surveys 18 to assess soil vapor intrusion potential in accordance with <br /> California Department of Toxic Substances Controls (DTSC) protocol. Follow-up indoor air <br /> sampling at an industrial facility located northwest of the site on Stockton Avenue verified that <br /> soil vapors presented no significant risk to human health19. ECM collected quarterly soil vapor <br /> samples at the Stockton Avenue property and at other locations west of the Site in 2008 to <br /> assess any seasonal variations of soil gas emissions from impacted groundwater 20. The data <br /> analyses did not reveal any significant seasonal variation. <br />