Laserfiche WebLink
URS <br /> ' Ms. Kathy Amaru Page 3 of 6 <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board—Central Valley Region <br /> May 8,2011 <br /> On April 4 and May 2, 2011,URS conducted baseline groundwater monitoring which included: <br /> Measuring groundwater levels in six on-site monitoring wells and calculating the hydraulic gradient <br /> ' at the site. <br /> • Purging and collecting groundwater samples from the scheduled on-site monitoring wells (Mw-2- <br /> BP,MW-5-BP,MW-6-BP, MW-7-BP,MW-24-BP, and MW-25-BP). Monitoring well sampling <br /> data sheets are included as Attachment A. <br /> • Submitting groundwater samples to a California-certified laboratory for analysis of organic <br /> ' compounds by United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)Method SW8260B, anions, <br /> metals, hexavalent chromium,total organic compounds(TOC), and alkalinity. For a comprehensive <br /> list of analytes,please refer to the laboratory analytical report provided as Attachment B. <br /> Approximately three well volumes were purged from each well before sampling. Purging was <br /> performed by using dedicated, single-use, high-density polyethylene bailers. As each well was purged, <br /> ' temperature,pH,specific conductivity, and total dissolved solids were monitored periodically to verify <br /> that groundwater entering the well was indicative of aquifer conditions. After the purge volume was <br /> reached and when the above parameters indicated that the water in each well was representative of the <br /> aquifer, a water sample was collected from the well. Each sample was collected by lowering a new, pre- <br /> cleaned, dedicated bailer slowly to the water line and allowing it to fill while causing minimal agitation <br /> to the water column. Groundwater samples were carefully transferred to pre-cleaned, laboratory- <br /> provided sample containers. Once collected, the sample containers were labeled with the time and date <br /> ' of collection,project and sample identification codes, sampler's initials,type of analysis to be <br /> performed,and preservative method. <br /> The samples were then sealed in plastic bags and stored in an ice-filled chest at approximately 4 degrees <br /> Celsius until delivery to the laboratory. Each groundwater sample was delivered to the laboratory within <br /> the designated holding time and was accompanied by the appropriate chain-of-custody documentation. <br /> The groundwater samples were submitted to Curtis & Tompkins Laboratories in Berkeley, California. <br /> PILOT TEST ACTIVITIES <br /> ' For the pilot test activities,30 injection point locations were installed from south of monitoring well <br /> MW-6-BP, located in the former burn pit,to south of MW-5-BP. At each injection location, <br /> approximately 165 gallons of EOS diluted solution(at a 10:1 ratio of potable water to EOS)was <br /> injected into the subsurface from approximately seven to 23 feet bgs. The injection location borings <br /> were destroyed using bentonite slurry. <br /> 1 <br /> H:\Wpm=\RESD\DVI-Burn Pit@0110W.BP.IQMRI I Re cft,doc <br />