Laserfiche WebLink
S.R. Moore 9 2 - 20 March 200 <br /> Duel Vocational Institution <br /> 4. Item No. 7 from staffs 15 November 2005 review of the RWD states: Since the facility is in a <br /> 100 year floodplain, the following (Title 27, Section 21750(d)(2)) needs to be submitted: (a) <br /> engineering analysis to indicate the various hydrodynamic and hydrostatic forces expected to <br /> result at the site as a consequence of a 100 year flood and(b) structural or other engineering <br /> studies showing the design of the ponds and the flood protection devices at the facility and how <br /> these will prevent washout. This information was not included in the revised RWD. <br /> 5. A description of the surface area, depth, and volumetric capacity with two feet of freeboard shall <br /> be provided for each pond. Class II surface impoundments structures shall be constructed and <br /> maintained to prevent, to the greatest extent possible, inundation, erosion, slope failure, washout, <br /> and overtopping under 1000-year, 24-hour precipitation conditions, and shall be designed to <br /> contain the 100-year wet season precipitation without using the required two feet of freeboard. A <br /> water balance shall be provided that includes a two-year projected monthly water balance for the <br /> proposed facility demonstrating adequate containment capacity for the 100-year return period <br /> total annual precipitation, including consideration of at least the following: <br /> a.. A minimum of two feet of freeboard in each pond at all times. <br /> b. Historical local evaporation data(monthly average values). <br /> c. Local precipitation data with the 100-year return period annual total distributed monthly <br /> in accordance with mean monthly precipitation patterns for the first year followed by an <br /> average precipitation year. <br /> d. Proposed wastewater loading rates distributed monthly in accordance with expected <br /> seasonal variations (if applicable). <br /> e. Include the 1000-year, 24-hour precipitation event. <br /> 6. There are no shallow groundwater monitoring wells installed at the facility. The groundwater <br /> direction of east/northeast has been approximated based upon the deep groundwater water supply <br /> wells installed within the deep aquifer (total depth 490 to 615 feet). Based upon discussions with <br /> Mr. Kalkman of Carollo Engineers, three monitoring wells will be installed to initially determine <br /> the groundwater gradient. Once this gradient is established, one or more groundwater monitoring <br /> wells will be required such that the detection monitoring well network complies with Title 27. <br /> 7. The revised slope stability report was reviewed and needs additional information to comply with <br /> the requirements of Title 27 Section 21750(f)(5). The analysis evaluated the stability of the fill <br /> foundation pad that the ponds will be constructed in. The liner system was not evaluated. Title <br /> 27 states, "The stability analysis shall ensure the integrity of the unit, including its foundation, <br /> final slopes and containment systems under both static and dynamic conditions throughout the <br /> units life, closure period and post-closure maintenance period (emphasis added)." A report shall <br /> be provided that includes an analysis of the liner system and the weight the waste exerts (at <br /> maximum storage capacity) on the liner system. The analysis shall include the shear <br /> resistance/strength of the geosynthetic layer and soil. <br />