Laserfiche WebLink
1 v j. �e <br /> 4 <br /> m A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> Vapor Analytical Results <br />' TPHg and BTEX constituents were detected in all of the vapor samples except from the effluent <br /> sample taken on January 28, 2004 TPHg concentrations in samples collected from vapor wells <br /> VW1, VW2, VW4, and MW1 ranged from 5 7 parts per million by volume (ppmv) to 360 ppmv <br /> 1 The influent concentrations of TPHg ranged from 39 ppmv to 190 ppmv and the effluent <br /> concentration of TPHg ranged from <2 5 ppmv to 86 ppmv Benzene concentrations in samples <br /> collected from vapor V W 1, VW2, VW4, and MW 1 ranged from <0 05 to 2 8 ppmv The influent <br /> 1 concentrations of benzene ranged from 0 46 ppmv to 0 62 ppmv and the effluent concentrations <br /> ranged from <0 050 ppmv to 1 8 ppmv The effluent concentrations are within the requirements of <br /> the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) permit to operate Vapor <br />' analytical data are summarized in Table 2 and vapor data sheets are contained in Attachment 4 <br /> ' Water Treatment System Analytical Results <br /> The influent and effluent water samples collected from the treatment and discharge component of <br /> ' the vapor extraction system contained no detectable concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, MTBE, <br /> TAME, ETBE, DIPE, TBA, 1,2-DCA, or EDB A summary of analytical results is presented in <br /> Table 3 Groundwater laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody documentation are contained <br /> in Attachment 2 <br /> Air Sparge System Monitoring <br /> 1 The installation of the air sparge piping system located at the site is detailed in ATC's <br /> Remediation System Installation Report for the Farmer Property, 610 North Hunter Street, <br /> ' Stockton, California, dated April 8, 2003 ATC started the air sparge system on February 13, 2003 <br /> During the current reporting period, ATC personnel monitored the air sparge system on January 28, <br /> February 23, and March 26, 2004 Parameters monitored in the field included flow rates and <br /> ' induced pressure responses at on-site wells if applicable Field monitoring data are contained in <br /> Attachment 3 <br /> ' REMEDIATION SYSTEM EVALUATION <br /> Vapor Extraction System <br /> From December 30, 2003 to March 26, 2004, the vapor extraction system was operational for <br /> approximately 936 hours From December 30, 2003 to March 26, 2004, the average extracted <br /> vapor flowrate was approximately 53 cubic feet per minute (cfin) and the average influent vacuum <br /> achieved by the thermal oxidizer was 16 inches of mercury, based on the information contained on <br /> the field monitoring data sheets contained in Attachment 3 <br /> Based on influent flowrate of 53 cfm, average influent concentration of TPHg of 142 ppmv, and <br /> using the values supplied by SunStar Labs of 24 5 liters of vapor per mole of TPHg and a <br /> molecular weight of 86 27 grams per mole of TPHg yields <br /> s lenviro1625961quar11y11 qr-2004 doe 5 <br />