Laserfiche WebLink
• A S S d C I A T E 5 I N C <br /> Vapor Analytical Results <br /> TPHg and BTEX constituents were detected in all of the vapor samples, with the exception of the <br /> effluent vapor sample collected on June 25, 2003 Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected at or <br /> above the laboratory reported detection limits in the effluent vapor sample collected on June 25, <br /> 2003 TPHg concentrations in samples collected from vapor wells VW1, VW2, VW3, and VW4 <br /> ranged from 75 parts per million by volume (ppmv) to 2,000 ppmv The influent concentrations of <br /> TPHg ranged from 330 ppmv to 840 ppmv and the effluent concentration of TPHg ranged from <br /> <0 500 ppm to 23 ppmv Benzene concentrations in samples collected from vapor wells VWl, <br /> VW2, VW3, and VW4 ranged from <0 050 to 2 2 ppmv The influent concentrations of benzene <br /> ranged from 0 38 ppmv to 2 0 ppmv and the effluent concentration ranged from <0 005 ppm to <br /> 0 053 ppmv The effluent concentrations are within the requirements of the San Joaquin Valley Air <br /> Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) permit to operate Vapor analytical data are summarized in <br /> Table 2 and vapor data sheets are contained in Attachment 4 <br /> Water Treatment System Analytical Results <br /> i <br /> TPHg and BTEX were detected above laboratory reported detection limits in the influent water <br /> samples collected from the groundwater treatment and discharge component of the vapor <br /> extraction system The effluent water samples collected from the treatment and discharge <br /> component of the vapor extraction system contained no detectable concentrations of TPHg or <br /> BTEX MTBE, TAME, ETBE, DIPE, TBA, 1,2-DCA, and EDB were not detected in the <br /> influent or effluent samples, although the detection limits associated with the influent samples <br /> collected on May 21 and June 9 and 25, 2003 were elevated due to non-target analytes A <br /> summary of analytical results is presented in Table 3 Groundwater laboratory data sheets and <br /> chain-of-custody documentation are contained in Attachment 2 <br /> Air Sparge System Monitoring <br /> The installation of the air sparge piping system located at the site is detailed in ATC's <br /> Remediation System Installation Report for the Farmer Property, 610 North Hunter Street, <br /> Stockton, California, dated April 8, 2003 ATC started the air sparge system on February 13, 2003 <br /> During the current reporting period, ATC personnel monitored the air sparge system on April 18 <br /> and 30, May 2 and 21, and June 9 and 25, 2003 Parameters monitored in the field included flow <br /> rates and induced pressure responses at on-site wells if applicable Field monitoring data are <br /> contained in Attachment 3 <br /> REMEDIATION SYSTEM EVALUATION <br /> Vapor Extraction System <br /> From March 27 to June 25, 2003, the vapor extraction system was operational for approximately <br /> 1,587 hours From March 27 to June 25, 2003, the average extracted vapor flowrate was <br /> w lwordpro1625961quart1yl2gr-2003 doc 5 <br />