Laserfiche WebLink
;ICVV <br /> 0 <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> encountered When the sampler was advanced, O-ring seals and an expendable drive point <br /> provided a watertight system to ensure sample integrity <br />' When the tool was advanced to the desired depth, extension rods were sent downhole to brace the <br /> bottom of the sample screen as the tool casing was retracted When the casing was retracted, <br /> approximately 41-inches of screen with slot sizes of 0 004 inches was exposed Teflon tubing <br /> with a check valve attached to one end was inserted down the casing until it was immersed in <br />' groundwater Water was then pumped through the tubing and to the ground surface by <br /> oscillating the tubing up and down Following soil and groundwater sample collection, the <br /> borings were backfilled with neat cement grout to the ground surface <br /> Groundwater samples were kept on ice and delivered under chain-of-custody documentation to <br /> State-certified Argon Laboratories in Ceres, California for chemical analysis Groundwater <br /> samples were analyzed for TPHg by EPA method 8015, BTEX by EPA method 8020, and <br /> MTBE, TAME, ETBE, DIPE, TBA, 1,2-DCA, and EDB by EPA method 8260 The analytical <br /> results for groundwater samples are summarized in Table 2 Laboratory data sheets and sham- <br />' of-custody documentation are included in Appendix C <br /> 4.5 Hollow_ Stem Auger Drilling Activities <br /> On December 26 through <br />' throu h 28, 2001, an ATC geologist supervisedervised the advancement of three off- <br /> site <br /> ffsite <br /> soil borings to depths of approximately 42 feet bgs A site plan with soil boring locations is <br /> shown on Figure 2 Woodward Drilling, California License C57 710079, advanced the borings <br /> utilizing a hollow stem auger drill rig Soil samples were collected from the borings at five-foot <br /> intervals in stainless steel sampling tubes <br /> The cored samples and drill cuttings were characterized for soil type, moisture content, and <br />' visual evidence of petroleum hydrocarbons An FID was used as a field-screening device for the <br /> detection of petroleum hydrocarbon vapors in drill cuttings and cored samples A field geologist <br /> logged drill cuttings and soil samples utilizing the Unified Soil Classification System <br />' Descriptions of soil types encountered and sample collection intervals are included on the well <br /> construction logs contained in Appendix A The soil borings were then completed as three <br /> groundwater monitoring wells Drill cuttings were temporarily stored on site in 55-gallon DOT <br />' approved steel drums <br /> 4.6 Soil Analysis <br /> Selected soil samples were kept on ice and delivered under chain-of-custody documentation to <br /> P P y <br /> State-certified Argon Laboratories in Ceres, California for chemical analysis Selected soil <br /> samples were analyzed for TPHg by EPA method 8015, BTEX by EPA method 8020, and <br /> MTBE, TAME, ETBE, DIPE, TBA, 1,2-DCA, and EDB by EPA method 8260 The analytical <br /> results for soil samples are summarized in Table 1 Laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody <br /> documentation are included in Appendix B <br />' w lwordpro162596%reporuloff-site doc 5 <br />