My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012756
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
METTLER
>
2061
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
MS-88-3
>
SU0012756
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2020 12:49:09 PM
Creation date
2/6/2020 11:42:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012756
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
MS-88-3
STREET_NUMBER
2061
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
METTLER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240-
APN
05906037
ENTERED_DATE
1/2/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2061 E METTLER RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PC : 9-17-87 <br /> MS-88-3 <br /> STAFF ANALYSIS <br /> BACKGROUND AND PROPERTY HISTORY: <br /> The proposal was processed as a Staff Review With Public Notice <br /> project . On August 13 , 1987 , the Planning Division approved <br /> Minor Subdivision Application No. MS-88-3 subject to conditions. <br /> Subsequently, on August 24 , 1987 , the staff ' decision to approve <br /> was appealed by several neighboring property owners (see the <br /> attached appeal ) . <br /> The Planning Commission approved a similar proposal on May 1 , <br /> 1986 (MS-86-60) . That decision was subsequently appealed to the <br /> Board of Supervisors, who ultimately granted the appeal (denied <br /> the project ) on June 30, 1986 . The original proposal was for two <br /> 1 . 0-acre parcels and a 45 + acre remainder. At the time of the <br /> original Planning Commission action, the Commission had granted <br /> only one homesite parcel as part of their action, rather than the <br /> two requested. <br /> The major issues of the original proposal centered on the facts <br /> that the applicant ' s proposal was an encroachment of a nonagri- <br /> cultural use into an agricultural area and that Mr. Jagir is a <br /> teacher and realtor . The appeal questioned his qualifications as <br /> an owner-operator of an agricultural enterprise as defined by the <br /> Planning Title. The same basic issues have again arisen on this <br /> latest proposal , which was submitted on July 6 , 1987 . <br /> Procedurally, Section 9-1113 of the Title prohibits a similar <br /> application within one year of the date of denial . <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1 . "The proposed map is consistent with applicable General and <br /> Specific Plans as specified in Section 65451 of the <br /> Subdivision Map Act . " <br /> This finding can be made because the proposed division is <br /> consistent with the provisions of the GA zone, which is the <br /> primary zone consistent with the Agriculture designation. <br /> 2 . "The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is <br /> consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans. " <br /> This finding can be made because the creation of homesites <br /> for persons engaged in agriculture creates incentives for <br /> the maintenance of agricultural operations, which is a goal <br /> of the General Plan. <br /> -10- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.