Laserfiche WebLink
Second Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report June 2003 <br /> Boyett Petroleum,419 S.Main,Manteca,CA <br /> Page 5 <br /> TABLE 4 Laboratory Analytical Results (June 25,2003) <br /> Oxygenates/Additives <br /> B T E X TPH-G MTBE Other Oxygenates/Additives <br /> Detection 0.5 0.5 0.5 LO 0.05 0.5 0.5-5.0 <br /> Limits: 4g/L pg/L µg/L pg/L mg/L WL gg/L <br /> Analytical Method: 8260B 8260B 8260B 8260B 8015B 8260B 826013 <br /> Sample I.D. <br /> 3761-MW1-6/25/03 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 10.05 10,000 33 TAME <br /> 3761-MW2-6125/03 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.0 <0.05 18 <0.5-5.0 <br /> 3761-MW3-6/25/03 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.0 <0A5 <0.5 <0.5-5.0 <br /> 3761-MW6-6/25/03 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.0 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5-5.0 <br /> 3761-MW7-6125103 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <0,05 6,800 28 TAME <br /> 3761-MW86/25/03 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1A <0.05 <0.5 <0.5-5.0 <br /> 3761-MW9-6/25/03 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.0 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5-5.0 <br /> Unit Conversions: Anal ical <br /> ltg/L:parts per billion(ppb) BTEX=benzene,toluene,ethyl benzene,and total xylenes. <br /> mg/L:parts per million(ppm) TPH-G=total petroleum hydrocarbons,quantified as gasoline. <br /> MTBE=methyl tertiary-butyl ether <br /> EtOH=ethanol <br /> TBA=tertiary-butanol <br /> • DIPE=di-isopropyl ether <br /> ETRE=ethyl tertiary-butyl ether <br /> TAME=tertiary-amyl methyl ether <br /> 1,2-DCA�1,2-dichloroethane <br /> EDD=1,2-dibromoethane <br /> MONITOR WELL REDEVELOPMENT <br /> On July 15, 2003, a Condor representative was onsite to collect water level measurements and redevelop <br /> monitor wells MW-1 through MW-3 and MW-6 through MW-9. Attempts were made to redevelop <br /> monitor well MW-9 by surging and pumping the groundwater in the well with a surge block and pump. <br /> This redevelopment procedure was ineffective due to large volumes of medium-grained, well-rounded, <br /> and well-sorted sand infiltrating the well. The infiltration of sand resulted in a decrease of 0.10 feet in the <br /> measured total depth of MW-9. The water purged from MW-9 was light brown in color and cleared <br /> during redevelopment. No floating product, sheen, or odors associated with petroleum hydrocarbons were <br /> observed in MW-9. Heavy amounts of sand periodically interfered with the pump equipment. Based on <br /> the results of the redevelopment procedure applied to MW-9, the previous loss of MW-4 and MW-5 to <br /> sand infiltration, and the historic high sediment content observed in all the site monitor wells,the decision <br /> was made not to surge or pump the remaining monitor wells. In addition, it was determined even if <br /> redevelopment was successful, the potential benefits would be limited as water level measurements <br /> collected from the site monitor wells indicated the wells contained only two to three feet of water. <br /> All well-development equipment was cleaned prior to use by washing in a solution of laboratory-grade, <br /> non-phosphate detergent and deionized water, and double rinsing with deionized water. The purge water <br /> • discharged from MW-9 during redevelopment was placed in 55-gallon drums, sealed, labeled, and Ieft on <br /> A <br /> il� CONDOR <br />