Laserfiche WebLink
Groundwater Investigation,Monitor well Destruction and Installation,and Interim Remediation Pump Test Report <br /> Boyett Petroleum,419 S.Main St,Manteca,CA <br /> January 30,2004 <br /> Page 11 <br /> 4.2 DRILLING PROCEDURES <br /> ' A Condor geologist was on site to supervise the work. Prior to commencement of fieldwork, a tailgate <br /> safety meeting was held and a site-specific Health and Safety Plan was discussed with, and presented to, <br /> all field personnel for their signatures. <br /> ' The initial scope of work consisted of the destruction of monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5; the <br /> installation of a replacement monitoring well for MW-4; and the installation of a four-inch extraction well <br /> (EW-1) in the northwest corner of the property. The scope of work was modified after results of the CPT <br /> investigation indicated that the construction of MW-1 (Figure 6, Appendix A) was potentially allowing <br /> for increased vertical migration of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination into the lower groundwater <br /> zone. Condor contacted Mr. Wong of the SJCEHD by telephone and requested authorization to destroy <br /> ' MW-1 to eliminate the vertical conduit between the upper and lower groundwater zones. In addition, <br /> Condor requested authorization to install two four-inch diameter monitoring wells, one screened in the <br /> upper groundwater zone and one screened in the lower groundwater zone, in the vicinity of MWA. The <br /> ' two wells would be-used to monitor groundwater in the area previously monitored by MWA, and could <br /> also be used as groundwater extraction wells. Mr. Wong gave verbal authorization to Condor to destroy <br /> MW-I and to install the two additional wells. Consequently, MW-1 was properly destroyed and two four- <br /> inch monitoring wells (MW-10 and MW-11) were installed. In addition, the construction of EW-1 was <br /> modified from that proposed in the Interim Remediation Work Plan. The proposed construction of EW-1 <br /> would have allowed five feet of slotted casing to be above and 20 feet of slotted casing below the static <br /> 1 water table level at the time of the well installation. This design would have mimicked the construction of <br /> MW-1 by providing a conduit between the upper and lower groundwater zones. Consequently, the design <br /> of EW-1 was revised so that the well was screened entirely in the lower water groundwater zone. Drilling <br /> • services were provided by West Hazmat Drilling of Anaheim, California. <br /> 4.2.1 Monitoring Well Destruction Procedures <br /> On October 29, 2003, monitoring wells MWA, MW-4, and MW-5 were destroyed by over drilling the <br /> wells with eight-inch outside diameter, continuous-flight, hollow-stem auger and removing all well <br /> construction materials. The three monitoring wells were of two-inch FVC construction. Monitoring well <br /> MW-1 was installed a total depth of 36.5 feet, MWA was installed to a total depth of 26.5 feet and MW-5 <br /> was installed to a total depth of 26.5 feet. The traffic boxes were removed prior to over-drilling the wells. <br /> MW-1, MW-4, and MW-5 were over-drilled to 39, 28, and 30 feet bgs, respectively, to ensure removal of <br /> all well construction material. Neat cement was tremied into the boreholes from the bottom of the <br /> borehole to the surface, and an asphalt cap, approximately six inches thick, was placed to the ground <br /> surface. The traffic boxes and the well construction materials were removed from the site. <br />' The hollow-stem auger and other down-hole equipment were decontaminated between borings by steam <br /> cleaning to prevent cross-contamination. Stearn cleaning rinsate was placed in DOT-approved 55-gallon <br /> drums, sealed, labeled, and left on site where they will remain pending laboratory analyses and disposal. <br />' 4.2.2 Monitoring and Extraction Well Installation Procedures <br /> Three groundwater monitoring wells (MW-4R, MW-10, and MW-11) and one groundwater extraction <br />' well (EW-1) were installed on October 30, 2003 (Figure 2,.Appendix A). The well borings were drilled <br /> using a ten-inch outside diameter, continuous-flight, hollow-stem auger. Monitoring well construction <br /> graphics are included as part of the geologic boring log for each well (Appendix B) and construction <br />' .A..,. A, AAAV AA1Vl21LVA111� auu QlWaction wells are provided in 1 able 4, on the following page. <br />' '� CONDOR <br />