Laserfiche WebLink
' Boyett Petroleum January 15, 2001 <br /> 4.19 South Main Street, Manteca, California Page 3 <br /> Interim Report of Findings for Lateral <br /> Extent of Groundwater Contamination <br /> 3.0 Scope of Work <br /> This scope of work was developed to explore the lateral and vertical extent of groundwater <br />' contamination at Boyett Petroleum in Manteca, California. Soil contamination was not <br /> present in any of the soil samples collected from the new borings/monitoring wells. <br />' On December 20-22, 2000, WIN, Inc., in conjunction with Frontier Drilling, a state <br /> licensed drilling contractor, completed four (4) soil borings, that were converted to <br /> monitoring wells, to a depth of approximately 26.5' bgl (groundwater depth --17') to <br />' confirm the presence or absence of petroleum hydrocarbons and the vertical extent of the <br /> soil contamination in the unauthorized release area. The actual depth of the wells varied <br /> between 20' and 25'. This event provided further data to evaluate the soil contamination, <br /> and the extent of groundwater contamination underlying the site. <br /> Soil samples were taken from all four (4) borings at five (5) foot intervals for soil <br /> classification. Three (3) soil samples were selected from each boring at depths of 16-16 1/2 <br /> feet, 20-21 1/2 feet, and 26-26 1/2 feet for laboratory analysis. Each boring was converted <br /> into a monitoring well. <br />' A total of twelve (12) les were taken and analyzed using EPA method 5030/LUFT <br /> ( ) soil samples <br /> for gasoline petroleum hydrocarbons, EPA method 8260B for BTX&E compounds, <br /> oxygenates, Ethylene Dibromide (EDB), and 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA). The soil <br /> sample analysis indicated no detectable levels of Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline, <br /> t BTXE, oxygenates, EDB, or 1,2-DCA in the twelve (12) soil samples collected from the <br /> borings/wells (Table 1 and Appendix B). <br /> The locations of these new monitoring wells are shown in Figure 3 and are described below: <br /> • MW-5 was placed southest of MW-2, near Main Street <br /> ' • MW-6 was placed southwest of MW-1, behind the Mini-Mart <br /> MW-7 was placed west of MW-1, on the northwest end of the property <br /> • MW-8 was placed off-site, north of MW-1, across Wetmore ,Street <br /> ' The data collected during scope a of work was used to define the migration of the <br /> p <br /> groundwater plume, and to make recommendations regarding future work at this site. A <br /> ' revised Report of Findings will be submitted at a later date and will include Cone <br /> Penetrometer Technology (CPT) data, as well as the installation of a deep well extending <br /> k-Irviv the arnnndwater table. following the results of the CPT test. <br />