Laserfiche WebLink
L <br /> SUD Boyett Petroleum <br /> 419 South Main Street October 27, 1999 <br /> Manteca, Californias Pae 7 <br /> thirty feet (30') a unit of silty clay is present. The clay unit is underlain by a coarse <br /> sand and pee gravel unit,which contains a second groundwater aquifer(Figure 4). <br /> 6.0 Hydrology <br /> California and Federal Governments have mandated that virtually all groundwater is <br /> beneficial for current or future use, unless it can be demonstrated that no beneficial use is <br /> known. <br /> This "aquifer" is considered to be of beneficial use and as a result, must be protected from <br /> contamination. Those identified uses include agricultural and industrial, as well as <br /> Lpotential use for animal or human consumption. <br /> 6.1 Local Hydrology <br /> Groundwater was encountered between sixteen(16') and eighteen feet (18') below <br /> ground level (b.g.1). A second groundwater aquifer was encountered at thirty feet <br /> L (30') b.g.l. Groundwater elevations from the September 24, 1999 sampling event <br /> were used to construct a groundwater gradient map. The calculated gradient on <br /> September 24, 1999 was 0.002 ft/ft at North 12° West (Figure 5). Table 4 <br /> provides a tabular summary of the groundwater elevations in each monitoring <br /> well. <br /> L <br /> 70 Conclusions <br /> Based on the data developed during this scope of work the following conclusions have <br /> been made: <br /> • Soil contamination in the form of MTBE at concentrations ranging from 22 ug/Kg to <br /> 200 ug/Kg is present in MW-1, MW-3, and MW-4 located in the shallow subsurface <br /> underlying the site. <br /> • Groundwater contamination is present in the form of the gasoline oxygenates MTBE, <br /> TAME, and TBA. Groundwater contamination is present in MW 1, MW-3, and NM- <br /> 4. <br /> • Soil contamination does not exist in the soil columns represented by the borings from <br /> MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, and MW4 until the soil-water interface (capillary fringe) is <br /> encountered. Given this fact, it is believed that the source of the groundwater <br /> L <br />