My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINDSAY
>
302
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505929
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2020 7:18:39 PM
Creation date
2/6/2020 4:34:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0505929
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0003985
FACILITY_NAME
BANNER ISLAND
STREET_NUMBER
302
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LINDSAY
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
302 W LINDSAY ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br /> There is some indication that the aereal extent of soil contamination on the eastern portion <br /> of the parcel is limited to the north, east, and south in the former ship-building yard, <br /> between wells MW3, MW4, and MW5 and boring B3. The analytical results from soil <br /> samples collected during this and previous investigations (RESNA, MAY 1992) from these <br /> wells/borings have indicated low to non-detectable levels of VOCs and typical soil metal <br /> concentrations. However, there is less definition of the aereal extent of soil contamination <br /> on the western portion of the parcel, due to the limited soil and ground-water sampling <br /> activities conducted here. There is an indication that the aereal extent of soil contamination <br /> on the western portion is limited to the north and west by wells MW1 and MW9. The <br /> analytical results from soil samples collected during drilling of these wells have indicated <br /> non-detectable levels of VOCs and typical soil metal concentrations. <br /> It is important to note that the earlier soil gas survey results (LSCE, June 1993) may provide <br /> an indication of the potential aereal limits of soil contamination (from VOCs) because those <br /> soil gas results were verified by the current investigation's soil sampling results. The <br /> greatest concentrations of TPH as motor oil in soil were detected where the greatest fluxes <br /> of cycloalkanes/alkenes were present in the soil gases (B1, B2, and 134); alternatively, very <br /> low concentrations of TPH as motor oil in soil were detected where the lowest fluxes of <br /> cycloalkanes/alkenes were present in the soil gases (133). Additionally, xylenes were <br /> detected in soil in the area of greatest soil gas fluxes of BTEX (133), and petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons and naphthalene were detected in ground water in the area greatest soil gas <br /> fluxes of cycloalkanes/alkenes and moderate fluxes of naphthalenes (134). This qualitative <br /> relationship between soil gas fluxes and soil sampling results may be an additional indication <br /> of the aereal limit of soil contamination from VOCs. In the eastern portion of the parcel, <br /> the soil gas survey identified the potential aereal limit of soil contamination within the <br /> former ship-building yard. However, the soil gas survey did not encompass the entire <br /> western portion of the parcel, so the potential aereal limit of soil contamination, particularly <br /> the portion of the parcel west of boring B4, is not known. <br /> [aU <br /> LHDORFF & SCALMANINI <br /> C:fl N 5 I.1 L ! I N L: ENGINEFRS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.