My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINDSAY
>
302
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505929
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2020 7:18:39 PM
Creation date
2/6/2020 4:34:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0505929
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0003985
FACILITY_NAME
BANNER ISLAND
STREET_NUMBER
302
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LINDSAY
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
302 W LINDSAY ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD - CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Phone: (916) 361-5600 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 ATSS Phone: 8-495-5600 <br /> TO: William H. CrooksU L Q FROM: Cori Condon <br /> Executive Officer- 1992 Assoc. Eng. Geologist <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTh, <br /> PERMIT/SERVICE �l <br /> DATE: 2 July 1992 SIGNATURE: C oyl6n <br /> SUBJECT: CITY OF STOCKTON, BANNER ISLAND, STOCKTON, S JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the Second Phase Subsurface Investigation for the City of Stockton, <br /> Banner Island property. The City's property occupies a part of Banner Island which <br /> was formerly a ship building facility. The facility was torn down in the seventies <br /> and in November 1989, two monitoring wells were installed at the site to assess the <br /> subsurface conditions. The results of the laboratory analysis of the water samples <br /> showed hazardous levels of cadmium (650 - 2, 100 ppb) and elevated concentrations of <br /> arsenic, chromium, lead and selenium in the ground water. <br /> The second phase of investigation was carried out in March 1992 in which seven <br /> additional monitoring wells were installed. Monitoring and sampling of all of the <br /> wells on-site showed the water table gradient is to the north (away from the Deep <br /> Water Channel ) and ground water had high concentrations of arsenic, barium, <br /> chromium, and selenium. Acetone has also been detected in two of the monitoring <br /> wells on the property. The Report includes a survey of water quality of three other <br /> sites in the area of Stockton; each of these site also has ground water with <br /> concentrations of arsenic, barium, chromium, and selenium above State Primary MCL's. <br /> The consultant concludes ground water at the City of Stockton's Banner Island site <br /> is consistent with water quality of the south-central Stockton area and that past <br /> practices at the site have not caused any ground water degradation. <br /> Based on results of this assessment and previous work performed on the site, the <br /> consultant also concludes that ground water in the Stockton area is of poor quality <br /> due to chlorides and TDS. The average electrical conductivity of the purging water <br /> data collected while sampling at the site, is about 842 umhos/cm. Based on State <br /> Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 88-63, all waters of the State are <br /> considered suitable, or potentially suitable, fcr municipal or domestic water supply <br /> unless the electrical conductivity exceeds 5,000 umhos/cm. Therefore, as outlined in <br /> the Basin Plan, it is necessary to consider the ground water at this site as being <br /> potentially suitable as a drinking water resource. <br /> The high concentrations of metals and occurrence of acetone in the ground water <br /> underlying the former ship building yard (traditional users of chemicals, paints, <br /> and metals) suggests that these contaminants are from the past operational practices <br /> and/or are caused by materials used to build the island itself. If the contamination <br /> at this site were naturally occurring, we would expect concentrations to be more <br /> consistent across the site. Although the Deep Water Channel was a losing channel <br /> during the reporting period, the gradient may reverse during other seasons of the <br /> year and these contaminants would be discharging into surface waters, threatening <br /> water quality. Therefore, it is necessary to look more closely at the hydraulics of <br /> the island to gain a better knowledge of ground water and surface water quality, to <br /> determine seasonal or tidal effects upon ground water and drainage systems and to <br /> improve our understanding of stratigraphic zones and soil quality. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.