Laserfiche WebLink
SOCkAU of Petroleurn Engineers <br /> SPE 16798 <br /> Systematic Design and Analysis of Step-Rate Tests To Determine <br /> Formation Parting Pressure <br /> by P.K. Singh, R.G. Agarwal, and L.D. Krase, Amoco Production Co. <br /> SPE Members <br /> Copyright 1907,Society of Petroleum Engineers <br /> This paper was prepared for presentation at the 62nd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers held In <br /> Dallas,TX September 27-30,1987. ■/�■ <br /> This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE Program Committee following review of information contained In an abstract submitted by the <br /> author(s).Contents of the paper,as presented,have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the •Y\ i//• <br /> authof(s).The material,as presented,does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers,Its officers,or members.Papers <br /> presented at SPE meetings are subject to publication review by Editorial Committees of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.Permission to copy Is <br /> restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words.Illustrations may not be copied.The abstract should contain conspicuous acknowledgment of <br /> where and by whom the paper Is presented.Write Publications Manager,SPE,P.O.Box 633836,Richardson.TX 75083.3836.Telex,730989 SPEDAL. <br /> ABSTRACT Determination of FPP is of critical importance <br /> for efficient operation of waterfloods and tertiary <br /> Step rate testing (SRT) has been used for sev- recovery projects. Injection above parting pressure <br /> eral years to determine the formation or fracture can result in premature breakthroughs, poor sweep, <br /> parting pressure (FPP). Unfortunately, little is reduced oil recovery, and loss of costly injection <br /> available in the literature regarding SRT design and fluids due to uncontrolled fracture extension. On <br /> analysis. Further, the available guidelines are the other hand, injection at pressures far below the <br /> inadequate and may lead to questionable values of FPP implies injecting at a lower rate than an allo- <br /> the FPP. wable maximum and thereby a reduced rate of oil <br /> recovery. <br /> A systematic investigation of several signifi- <br /> cant factors affecting SRT design and analysis is Unfortunately, technology development in the <br /> presented. The analysis of SRT data influenced by area of step rate tests has not kept pace with field <br /> wellbore storage and changing wellbore storage is operations even though these tests have been common <br /> investigated. The proper application of multirate place in our industry for over 40 years. This is <br /> analysis methods to SRT data is outlined. A new reflected by a surprising lack of references in the <br /> method is proposed for determining parting pressure literature on the subject and continued problems <br /> from SRT data on fractured wells. Field examples with the interpretation of such tests. To our <br /> are included. This work should significantly knowledge, there have been only two papers published <br /> enhance our ability to successfully design and ana- in the literature,213 which directly address step <br /> lyze Che step rate tests. rate test (SRT) design and analysis. A brief dis- <br /> cussion is also presented in SPE Monograph 5.4 Our <br /> INTRODUCTION investigation shows that the previously available <br /> guidelines are inadequate and may lead to question- <br /> Step rate testing (SRT) is the primary method able values of the FPP. <br /> used to define the maximum safe injection pressure <br /> without fracturing the reservoir rock. This pres- The entire subject of multiple rate flow into <br /> sure is referred to as the formation or fracture the reservoir during a SRT, coupled with reservoir <br /> parting pressure (FPP). It is the pressure that fracturing, is a complex one since it requires a <br /> will initiate a fracture in an unfractured well or knowledge of both rock mechanics and fluid flow <br /> will extend an existing fracture in a fractured aspects of the problem. A recently published paper <br /> well. The "FPP" determined from step rate tests is provides some understanding regarding waterflood <br /> equivalent to the term "fracture extension/ induced fracture propagation.5 The analysis of SRT <br /> propagation pressure" used in the hydraulic frac- data is also subject to the type of problems which <br /> turing literature.) The FPP is generally greater are common to other pressure transient tests. <br /> than the "closure pressure" (defined as the pressure <br /> required to initiate the opening of an existing This paper presents (1) a discussion of the <br /> fracture) determined from pump-in/flowback tests.) test procedure and the theoretical basis for the <br /> conventional and multirate analysis methods; (2) the <br /> influence of several parameters such as time step <br /> duration, rate increment, wellbore storage, and <br /> changing wellbore storage on test data; (3) the <br /> References and illustrations at end of paper. <br /> 491 <br />