My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
26500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544501
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2020 9:09:16 PM
Creation date
2/10/2020 3:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544501
PE
2954
FACILITY_ID
FA0014311
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY DEFENSE DEPOT
STREET_NUMBER
26500
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
SEE COMMENTS
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
26500 S CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
S. Page 1-16, Section 1.4.2.7.1 <br /> The sentence should read "A risk assessment will be required <br /> to evaluate the potential threat to human health and the <br /> environment should a no action scenario exist. " <br /> 5. Page 1-16, Section 1.4.2.7.2 <br /> The sentence should read "In case . . . pose a threat to human <br /> health and the environment . . . cleanup levels for the <br /> Chemicals of Concern. " <br /> 6. Page 2-1, Section 2. 1.1.2 <br /> Give a percentage as to which areas are unpaved. . State what <br /> percentage of the unpaved area is covered with gravel. <br /> State if it has been documented that there has been no <br /> contamination released to the air in the unpaved areas <br /> covered with gravel (since gravel does not constitute a <br /> seal) . <br /> 7 . Page 2-2, Section 2. 1.2 .2 . 1 <br /> The text states that previous investigations at the DDRW- <br /> Tracy have focused on the upper 200 feet, "primarily because <br /> site-related contaminants are not thought to have penetrated <br /> to greater depths. " There has been no data produced which <br /> can support this assumption. Revise this statement. <br /> 8 . Page 2-7, Section 2 .1. 3.2 <br /> DDRW-Tracy begins this section (2 . 1.3.2 . 1) by stating that <br /> the "relevant hydrogeology of the depot concerns the <br /> groundwater in the Upper Tulare Zone. " Once again there is <br /> no data to support the assumption that the Lower Tulare has <br /> not been impacted. Possible pathways for migration to the <br /> Lower Tulare exist in the onsite water wells and off-site <br /> agricultural and domestic wells, several of which are <br /> perforated in both the Upper and Lower Tulare. <br /> Investigation of the possible impact of the Lower Tulare has <br /> not been done. Revise this text. <br /> 9 . Page 2-11, Section 2 . 1.4. 1 <br /> The solvents stored in drums are heated by the sun. Explain <br /> if they potentially release contaminants into the air. <br /> 10 . Page 2-11, Section 2 . 1.5. 1 <br /> State if the San Joaquin River or any of its tributaries are <br /> used for recreational activities and if this is a potential <br /> exposure pathway. <br /> This section describes the surface water runoff system on <br /> the depot. Surface runoff is collected in an unlined storm <br /> drain holding pond. If capacity is exceeded, then the <br /> excess is pumped to a local drainage ditch draining into the <br /> San Joaquin River. The surface runoff in route to this <br /> unlined holding area and drainage ditch flows over surfaces <br /> I-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.