My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
26500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544501
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2020 9:09:16 PM
Creation date
2/10/2020 3:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544501
PE
2954
FACILITY_ID
FA0014311
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY DEFENSE DEPOT
STREET_NUMBER
26500
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
SEE COMMENTS
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
26500 S CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Revise/clarify the text. <br /> 26. Page 3-2, Section 3.1.0.4 <br /> State if there have been any San Joaquin County Health <br /> Department (SJCHD) permit violations for the UST currently <br /> in use. <br /> 27 . Page 3-2, Section 3.1.1.1 <br /> State the chemical components of No. 2 fuel oil, diesel fuel <br /> and lubrication oil. <br /> 28 . Page 3-10, Section 3.1.7.5.1.3 <br /> It is stated that only a single boring is planned for UST <br /> No. 27a "due to the likelihood that TCE detected in the <br /> excavation is from a source other than the UST. " State the <br /> basis of this conclusion. Explain which tank this is (the <br /> 250-gallon tank or the 4 , 000-gallon tank) . <br /> 29 . Pages 3-12 and 3-13, Section 3.2. 1. 1. 1 <br /> According to the U. S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials <br /> Agency (USATHAMA) report of 1980 (page 32) , some industrial <br /> wastes "may have gone into the sanitary or storm system. <br /> Before the second IWP was dug, there was a small overflow to <br /> the sewage effluent pond from the original IWP. " (The <br /> sanitary ponds are SWMU No. 2 , and the storm drainage lagoon <br /> is SWMU No. 4 . ) The present IWPs now occupy a portion of <br /> the original southernmost sewage pond. These statements, in <br /> addition to the detection of elevated levels of metals and <br /> some pesticides in downgradient wells LM3 and LM15, lead to <br /> a likely conclusion that either leakage into the soils has <br /> occurred in the past from these IWPs and/or from the <br /> attached IWPL (SWMU No. 33) and/or that leakage may be <br /> presently occurring. EPA believes that SWMU No. 3 needs to <br /> be given priority in the field investigations due to the <br /> potential risks to human health and the environment posed by <br /> many of these wastes. (See alsb General Comment No. 11. ) <br /> Propose appropriate investigative action. <br /> 30. Pages 3-14, 3-18 and 3-19, Sections 3 .2 . 1. 1.7 and 3.2 . 1.5. 4 <br /> The cyanides and sulfides, found in the solid and liquid <br /> samples of the IWP's can be expected to be in the soils <br /> also. Propose appropriate sampling. <br /> 31. Page 3-15, Section 3.2 . 1.2 .2 . <br /> In this section for SWMU No. 3 , the contact between the <br /> Shallow Unit and the Upper Horizon is identified as being <br /> located at a depth of approximately 27 feet below grade. In <br /> paragraph 3.2 . 1.2 .3, the text states that the water table in <br /> this area occurs at about 16 feet below grade and that the <br /> aquifer appears to occur under unconfined conditions. Is <br /> this shallow unit of Holocene Age? If the Upper Horizon is <br /> the uppermost water-bearing zone and is unconfined, then the <br /> I-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.