Laserfiche WebLink
enough to 4. <br /> know there is, or is NOT a problem? Naturally CATRANS claims no p/h <br /> were s <br /> used! ! ! I'm not buying it. . . .I saw what looked like an old truck <br /> mounted, <br /> fold-down, spray thingy collecting rust in the storage area. . .besides, <br /> their <br /> 'chemical' bin-warehouse was "not available" for i spection. . _ _ _so my <br /> attitude was, "don't show me?, then test for it ALL ! ! " . _ _ <br /> a positive hit on any existing WO soil testing wou d require more <br /> investigation (lateral and vertical Jelin) and even a groundwater <br /> sampling <br /> event. . . .so with 'hits' supporting a true problem, I wouldn't have a <br /> problem with making them use the full list you emailed . . .but with no <br /> written protocol. . . . . . .???? <br /> whacha think.? any quick-look kinda tests for p/h' s? <br /> I'm open for suggestions. . . .EPA lady out on maternity and past request <br /> like <br /> this have created more questions than answers. . . <br /> help? <br /> 2 <br />