My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KROHN
>
2005
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0518440
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2020 8:07:18 PM
Creation date
2/10/2020 4:39:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518440
PE
3030
FACILITY_ID
FA0013911
FACILITY_NAME
CALTRANS TRACY MAINTENANCE STATION
STREET_NUMBER
2005
STREET_NAME
KROHN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2005 KROHN RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
need <br /> confirmation on interpretation. The tank was emptied and contents <br /> analyzed. <br /> They found high levels (350,000 ug/L) of toluene. The tank somehow <br /> filled <br /> with liquid again, a sample of the liquid was analyzed and 2100 ug/L of <br /> toluene was found. The guidelines discuss removing the contents and <br /> performing a visual inspection of the tank_ If cracks or leaks or <br /> visibly <br /> contaminated soil are seen then the tank and any contaminated soil is to <br /> be <br /> removed and disposed of appropriately. So if there are no cracks, leaks <br /> or <br /> visibly impacted soil, does that mean the tank can remain in place and <br /> sampling beneath it is not required? <br /> The consultant wants to remove the liquid and clo e the tank by filling <br /> it <br /> with clean material. Is this ok? Or�do they havl to rinse the tank <br /> until <br /> results indicate the rinseate contains no residual toluene. <br /> There were two soil samples collected beneath the leach lines. one was <br /> 30 <br /> feet away from the tank because at 20 feet from the tank there was a i <br /> tree i <br /> stump, also there was a break in the leach line a this location, and <br /> the <br /> other at the end of the leach line (15 feet from the first sample) . <br /> Both <br /> samples were ND for VOCs. Is this sufficient? <br /> Depth to water at this site is about 90 feet. I don't think the <br /> contamination in the tank is a threat to groundwater. Can we take this <br /> into <br /> consideration before requiring more soil sampling. <br /> I <br /> Secondly, we got the work plan for the Cal Trans site. Did you get a <br /> copy? <br /> They are only investigating the former leach line area and are sampling <br /> around the leach lines not beneath them. Is this appropriate or should <br /> _be <br /> direct them to sample every 20 feet below each leach line? <br /> Ate-we supposed to copy you on all correspondence for UIC sites? <br /> Margaret <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.