Laserfiche WebLink
• On December 28, 2001, a flange on a piping manifold, near MW-15A, failed and released less than 10 <br /> gallons of red dye diesel. On January 9, 2002, 15 soil samples were collected in and around the spill <br /> area. Borings were advanced to approximately 0.5 to 1.5 feet bgs (SECOR, 2002a). <br /> • In November 2002, an assessment report and work plan for additional site assessment was submitted <br /> which summarized the results of the installation of five offsite monitoring wells (MW-54A, MW-55A, <br /> MW-57A, MW-58A, and MW-59A) (SECOR, 2002b). Due to property access complications, MW- <br /> 56A was not installed. The objective of the offsite assessment activities was to delineate the lateral <br /> extent of petroleum hydrocarbons (including MtBE) in offsite groundwater. MtBE concentrations were <br /> detected in the five borings, ranging from 0.6 µg/L (MW-55, MW-57 and MW-59) to 1.0 µg/L (MW- <br /> 54). TPHd concentrations were detected in three of the five samples at concentrations ranging from 84 <br /> µg/L (MW-55)to 160 µg/L (MW-57). <br /> • In August 2002, a construction support activities report was submitted (SECOR, 2002c). This report <br /> documented the following activities: <br /> 1. Pre- and post-removal soil characterization within the footprint of the ethanol transfer facility <br /> excavation. <br /> 2. The destruction and proper abandonment of MW-14A and TW-3. <br /> 3. The collection of post-remedial soil data in the former dual extraction (DE) area and post- <br /> demolition soil data in the card lock area. <br /> 4. The segregation, profiling,transportation and disposal of affected soil within the transfer facility <br /> excavation. A total of 397 tons of soil was removed from the excavated area and transported to <br /> Forward Landfill in Manteca, California. <br /> • Between January 21 and 29, 2003, site assessment activities were performed to delineate the vertical <br /> and lateral extent of hydrocarbons at the site. The site assessment included advancing 15 soil borings <br /> (NSB-0 through NSB-4 and NSB-6 through NSB-15) and installing 5 monitoring wells (MW-61UA, <br /> MW-62UA, MW-63A, MW-64B, and MW-65A). Additionally, soil borings PL-1 through PL-9 were <br /> advanced using a dutch auger or pneumatic "air knife" tool to approximately 4 feet bgs (SECOR, <br /> I2003b). <br /> • In March 2003, a 1,000-gallon transmix (tank ID 1842-6) UST was removed and select sidewall soil <br /> samples were collected from the tank pit area, under the oversight of the Tracy Fire Department. <br /> Results of soil sampling indicated moderate levels of petroleum hydrocarbons along the sidewalls of the <br /> tank pit. Soil analytical results are presented in Table 6. On September 3, 2003, monitoring well MW- <br /> ' 67UA was installed approximately 50 feet downgradient of the UST, to a total depth of 15 feet bgs with <br /> a screened interval of 5 to 15 feet bgs (SECOR, 2004d). <br /> • In May 2003, a step-drawdown test and a constant-rate aquifer pumping test were performed to estimate <br /> hydraulic characteristics for the Upper A zone and the A zone aquifers beneath the site. Results of the <br /> step-drawdown test performed in the Upper A zone indicate the maximum sustainable extraction rate for <br /> wells screened in this zone should not exceed 0.9 gallons per minute (gpm). In addition, for effective <br /> dewatering,the spacing of wells utilized in dewatering the Upper A zone should not exceed 25 feet from <br /> center to center. Results also indicate that extraction from the Upper A zone influenced monitoring well <br /> MW-24A, which is screened in the underlying A zone. This suggests that hydraulic communication <br /> BLASLAND, BOUCK &LEE, INC. <br /> 3124106 engineers,scientists,economists 2-3 <br /> J:\D0006\44634-00161022_ConceptuaI Site Model.doc <br />