My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HOUSTON
>
1740
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545289
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2020 11:39:49 AM
Creation date
2/11/2020 8:33:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545289
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003828
FACILITY_NAME
VAN BUSKIRK GOLF COURSE
STREET_NUMBER
1740
STREET_NAME
HOUSTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16307036
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1740 HOUSTON AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ?' \ <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION •" _ <br /> Karen Furst, M.D., M.P.H., Health Officer P <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor • Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> 2091468-3420 CIO <br /> Mr. Robert Murdock <br /> City of Stockton AUG 12 1997 <br /> 425 N EI Dorado St. <br /> Stockton CA 95202 <br /> RE: Van Buskirk Golf Course SITE CODE: 1146 <br /> 1740 Houston Avenue <br /> Stockton CA 95206 <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division <br /> (PHSIEHD) has reviewed the July 24, 1997 Site Characterization Report <br /> prepared by the Twining Laboratories, Inc. for the above referenced site. <br /> In the report Twining concludes that a groundwater plume is present with <br /> concentrations approaching the free product range beneath the site, and that the <br /> current network of monitoring wells is inadequate. PHSIEHD concurs with this <br /> conclusion. <br /> Drawing number five of the report is misleading because the gasoline plume <br /> extends beyond SB-1 (5100 ppb) and a southern plume boundary has been <br /> drawn without the support of single datum. The diesel plume may also extend <br /> south of the drawn southern plume boundary and it is also present in SB-1 (2500 <br /> ppb), SB-3 (330 ppb), SB-6 ( 450 ppb). MTBE was present in groundwater <br /> samples from SB-1, SB-2, SB-4, SB-5, and SB-7. <br /> There is lncOnsiStenct between the �eoprob ing to s which describe the <br /> native soil fromg _ t as clams and the boring logs from -1,2 and—d3 <br /> — <br /> native <br /> describe the top 16 feet of the soil profile as sandy. MW-1 as s <br /> surface to 16 feet and clay fromj'§6 ' feed and M1 V-'-2 was clay from 8-13 feet <br /> with sand above and below and1/11-3 as backfill to 12 feet and sand to 30 feet. <br /> Sandy soil facilitates both plume migration and in situ remedial alternatives <br /> There is Mwfttstenfy between the hydropunch analytical results and the <br /> analytical results from M:3.and MW-1. Hydropunch analytical samples <br /> commonly result in increased hydrocarbon concentrations of one to two orders of <br /> magnitude. The difference between the results in SB-1 (2500 ppb TPH , 5100 <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County Health Care Services <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.