Laserfiche WebLink
Farmer Texaco,Lodi <br /> Page'4 r <br /> perceived need to speculate regarding the possibility that past releases at-the . <br /> Toga's site contributed dichloroethane to the subsurface environment. <br /> Recommendation <br /> I concur with the County's conclusion that "no fi%t her.:regulatory action" is <br /> justified in this case. There is no identified, reasonable water quality benefit to be <br /> gained by further exploration,monitoring, or analysis of the decades-old release at <br /> the Togo's site. Thus, the LUFT case at 305 South Hutchins Street in the City of <br /> It _ � i <br />(, Lodi should be closed immediately and its monitoring wells,which were installed <br /> specifically for the purposel of characterizing that'sitei:should be abandoned per <br /> 1 County requirem%eats. E <br /> . .;-,:. i.�s'"�"•' `'=rwr--�??-.,=`yd3�"-4a, -` �� --;:-:.'.. .z.:: ps .s - <br /> 4: <br /> While these wells may provide supplemental+spatial geochexnical data regarding <br /> the distribution df concentrations in the dry cleaner solvents plume,no data or <br /> technical analyses have been provided to indicate that any of these sampling points <br /> are particularly relevant,(let alone critical) for that purpose. Therefore,there is no <br /> identified,reasonable water quality benefit to be gained in maintaining any of the E <br /> Existing monitoring wells (at expense or liability"�ofthe Togo's responsible parties) <br /> C: ;for use in the broader solvents plume investigation. ' <br /> I <br /> f <br /> Recycled Paper t 6r:missioh is to preserve and enhance the quality of California s water resources;.and <br /> ensuYe their proPer allarcgtion and efficient use for the benefit of pr'esenl and future generations, <br /> k � •ri <br />