Laserfiche WebLink
-owl <br /> ATTORNEYS AT LAW San Francisco.CA <br /> ogle God�ivard4-77P 415 693-2000 <br /> --y <br /> L Menlo Park, CA <br /> 1-4 .1 Five Palo Alto Square 415 943-5000 <br /> 3000 El Camino Real <br /> San Diego,CA <br /> -.Palo Alto,CA <br /> 619 550-6000 <br /> '3 94306-2155 7 AIN 9: PH 12- 35 Main 415 843-5000 Boulder,CO <br /> 303 546-4000 <br /> kx 415 857-0663 <br /> f <br /> en4'i,CO <br /> January 6, 1907 <br /> http,//wWw.cooley-com 363 606-4800 <br /> A, <br /> V';: bRETCHEN`R.,STR0UD,-,--;.:!-,— quf7o <br /> 415 843-5036 <br /> troudgrOcooley.com <br /> Mr. Michael Harper <br /> Contract Manager <br /> State Water Resources Control Board ii <br /> Local Oversight Program <br /> P.O. Box 944212 <br /> Sacramento, CA 942J.212G <br /> A!* <br /> iW Vxac6 tit <br /> 305 S. Hutchins Street <br /> Lodi California <br /> Dear Mr: Harper: <br /> 1*' Introduction <br /> We write with respect to thedispute resolution requested byMarggretI4gor.io of the San <br /> Joaquin.Cbahty Publid Health Services Environmental Health Division('PHS-EHD,")concerning <br /> the former Texaco site'located at 305 S. Hutchins Street, Lodi, California. We represent <br /> Autotr6nicSystems, Inc. (..."Autotronic"), A former operator.of the Bvkides'site. immedi <br /> ately <br /> north <br /> of the former iqq� .sl. <br /> .......... ...... <br /> r. <br /> The PHS 9HD`is: Technical Review Committee concluded that. all !hVd6dga&e And remedial. <br /> actions in response to a. ..1release from the::underground storage tanks at this location had been. <br /> taken,and.that.closure. was appropriate. The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board,;On the:other hand, determined that turther investigition and possible. remediation of the: <br /> former Texaco -. itemiy be required and did not concur with the "no further action" <br /> recommendation. <br /> 2 <br /> -.Autotroule..suppgM-elosure,oat.theformer-!Texaco site. 4 <br /> We emphasize that Aut6tronic agrees with the PHS-EHD's determination that closure: of ;.he <br /> Jormer Texaco site is appropriate basedon the low adverse health .risk- :presented by.the <br /> 1. .based.petroleum contaminatioui.remain on.the former Texaco ilsitd- This conclusion is ed u <br /> the facts.that.benzene contamination a at site has been addressed by the soil vapor <br /> with to .and. :.the. current ft site is a:mostly-paved property wl asandwich shop. <br />