My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003149
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
212
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545309
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2020 11:48:19 PM
Creation date
2/11/2020 9:17:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003149
RECORD_ID
PR0545309
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0010339
FACILITY_NAME
H&H ENGINEERING CONST INC
STREET_NUMBER
212
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206-3920
APN
17728019
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
212 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> Ms Vicky McCartney <br />' September 27, 2005 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> i <br /> 1 <br /> Prior to sampling, monitoring wells MW 1 through MW3 were purged of a minimum of three <br /> 1 well casing volumes During the purging process, temperature, pH and electrical conductivity <br /> parameters were measured Samples were collected after parameter stabilization, and 100% <br /> water level recovery Groundwater samples were delivered under chain of custody protocol to <br /> Argon Laboratories (ELAP #2359) for analysis of TPHg by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX by EPA <br /> Method 8021B, and gasoline oxygenates and additives by EPA Method 8260B Purge water <br /> was contained in a properly labeled DOT-approved 55-gallon drum The drum is currently being <br />' stored onsite Purge logs are included in Appendix A <br /> Groundwater Analytical Results <br />' Toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes were not detected in the samples from any site well Benzene <br /> was detected in samples from wells MW 1 and MW3 at concentrations of 4 5 parts per billion (ppb) <br />' and 17 ppb, respectively TPHg was reported in the sample from well MW1 at a concentration of <br /> 96 ppb TPHg was not detected in the samples from wells MW2 and MW3 _ <br />' 1,2-DCA was detected in the sample from upgradient well MW2 at a concentration of 1 3 ppb No <br /> other gasoline, oxygenates or additives were detected in any samples Groundwater analytical <br /> results are summarized in Table 2 A copy of the laboratory report including chain of custody <br /> . documentation is included in Appendix B <br />' Summary <br /> The three monitoring wells at the site were monitored and sampled on August 19, 2005 Results <br /> can be summarized as follows <br /> Ia Groundwater levels in the site monitoring wells fell since last monitored in March 2005 <br /> The average groundwater gradient across the site was 0 014 ft/ft (approximately 74 <br /> ft/mile) Groundwater flowed in a northeasterly direction, which is consistent with <br /> previous measurements I <br /> a Benzene was present at low levels in the water samples from wells MW1 and MW3 The <br /> benzene concentration in MW3 was the lowest recorded since August 2001 TPHg was <br /> I detected in the sample collected from well MW1 A very low level of 1,2-DCA was <br /> detected in the groundwater sample from upgradient well MW2 L7 3 �' <br /> IConclusions <br /> Data from the current investigation along with that from previous phasesf investigation have <br /> completely defined the lateral extent of groundwater contamination Figure�qualitatively depicts <br /> I the extent of dissolved benzene in groundwater utilizing data from all discrete groundwater samples <br /> I <br /> G IGROUNDZEIW-E1SAR12001\2SAR05 doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.