Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> cubic yards of spoil from an area about 20' wide X 20 ' long X 20 <br /> deep. Samples were to be analyzed for BTEX, ED8, & TPH-G. The <br /> removed spoil and the domestic water well on the property were <br /> also to be sampled and tested. Refer to Exhibit E for details of <br /> the workplan. <br /> On September 4, 1991 , Wm. Hunter, R. G. , picked up a sealed sample <br /> kit from EGL Environmental . Crushed ice was purchased & placed <br /> in the ice chest in insure that the collected soil samples would <br /> be at the proper temperature while awaiting transport to the lab. <br /> Jim Thorpe Oil equipment arrived on location, and began removing <br /> concrete and soil from the site. Excavation began on the west <br /> side; soils consisted of a firm to hard reddish-brown clayey loam <br /> dawn to about B feet, grading to looser, less consolidated clays <br /> and clayey sands. No odor or staining was noted down to 10 , <br /> where some obvious contamination was observed in the sandy <br /> lenses. Some darker lenses of gray to greenish-gray sands and <br /> sandy clays were present, but close visual examination revealed <br /> that the calor was due primarily to an abundance of dark colored <br /> f erromagnesian minerals and not contamination. However, some <br /> portions of the lenses did have a definite petroleum odor. <br /> Removed spoil was placed in a large dump truck directly from the <br /> . backhoe bucket and placed on plastic in an open flat area to the <br /> east of the work site. <br /> A large tree at the west and of the excavation and a fence on the <br /> south side prevented further work in those directions. The <br /> backhoe was relocated, and began to remove spoil from the north <br /> side as close as possible to a small corrigated metal storage <br /> shed. A definite petroleum odor was evident in some of the <br /> harder layers below the reddish-brown loam. due to the <br /> limitations of the equipment, it was not possible to remove any <br /> more spoil from the site without removing the tree, fence, and <br /> shed. Rather than wait for larger equipment, it was decided to <br /> take soil samples and await the results prior to continuing the <br /> operation. The dimensions of the excavation were approximately <br /> 24' E-W, 22 ' N-S, and 18-20 ' deep; (refer to Plate VII . ) <br /> Because of the depth of the hole, and the possibility of caving , <br /> it was agreed that the backhoe bucket would be used to remove <br /> spoil for sampling. The sample locations were picked by Mr. <br /> Hunter & Mr. Knoll , the representative of the EHB; sail samples <br /> were collected from the teeth of the backhoe bucket by driving a <br /> clean 2" X 3" brass tube directly into the soil , promptly sealing <br /> the ends with teflon tape and plastic end caps, and wrapping the <br /> tube securely with duct tape. Samples were labeled and placed on <br /> ice for preservation. A total of b soil samples were taken from <br /> the bottom and sides of the excavation as shown can Plate VII <br /> 3 <br />